Luque et al v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filing 63

ORDER re CMC re 60 Stipulation filed by AT&T Communications of California, Inc., AT&T Corp., Pacific Bell Telephone Company Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/27/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/25/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

(Counsel listed on next page)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOE LEWIS LUQUE AND HERMAN RICHARDSON, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Plaintiffs, vs. AT&T CORP., PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE CO. d/b/a AT&T CALIFORNIA, AND AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendants.

No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DATE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

LEGAL_US_W # 65033831.1

STIP. AND ORDER RE: CMC DATE U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Counsel for Plaintiff Joe Lewis Luque and Herman Richardson: THOMAS MARC LITTON (Cal. State Bar No. 119985) SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] [e-mail] STEVEN L. WITTELS (N.Y. State Bar No. 2004635) DAVID W. SANFORD (N.Y. State Bar No. 457933) ANDREW MELZER (N.Y. State Bar No. 4270682) STANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP 1350 Avenue of the Americas, 31st Floor New York, New York 10022 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] MICHAEL RAM (Cal. State Bar No. 104805) KARL OLSON (Cal. State Bar No. 104760) RAM & OLSON LLP 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] EDMOND CLARK (Conn. State Bar No. 418915) LAW OFFICE OF EDMOND CLARK 83 Scotland Avenue Madison, Connecticut 06443 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail]

LEGAL_US_W # 65033831.1

STIP. AND ORDER RE: CMC DATE U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Counsel for Defendants AT&T Corp., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and AT&T Communications of California, Inc.: J. AL LATHAM, JR. (Cal. State Bar No. 071605) PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 515 South Flower Street, 25th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838) JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 248073) PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 55 Second Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-3441 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] WILLIAM CORY BARKER (Georgia State Bar No. 037727) PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 600 Peachtree Street, N.E., 24th Floor Atlanta, Georgia 30308 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail]

LEGAL_US_W # 65033831.1

STIP. AND ORDER RE: CMC DATE U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. b.

STIPULATION Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Luque and Herman Richardson and defendants AT&T Corp., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and AT&T Communications of California, Inc., acting through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. at 10:00 a.m. 2. On the parties' stipulation, the Court has continued the hearing on plaintiffs' motion for The case management conference in this action currently is scheduled for June 25, 2010,

conditional certification to August 27, 2010, to permit pre-conditional certification discovery. 3. Accordingly, the parties believe it would serve the interest of convenience and judicial

economy if the case management conference were continued. The parties, however, do not agree on the new date for the conference: a. Plaintiffs propose that the case management conference be continued to August 27, 2010, the same date as the hearing on their motion for conditional certification. Since the parties will already be before the Court, an August 27 case management conference will be an opportune time to set a plan for discovery in this case. Discovery should continue between the hearing and the Court's A case management

decision on plaintiffs' conditional certification motion.

conference will materially aid in moving this matter forward during this period. Defendants propose that the case management conference be continued to a date at least 30 days after the Court rules on plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification, with a supplemented case management statement (as appropriate) filed one week before the conference. Defendants propose this new date because until the Court has ruled on conditional certification, the parties will not know the scope of the case, and therefore continuing the conference to August 27 will not materially aid in the planning process. The case management conference has been rescheduled two previous times by stipulation

of the parties and endorsement by the Court. However, a further postponement will not affect the overall schedule in the case as the parties will proceed with pre-certification discovery and continue LEGAL_US_W # 65033831.1
LEGAL_US_W # 65033831.3

STIP. AND ORDER RE: CMC DATE U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JSC)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

briefing on plaintiffs' motion in advance of the August 27 hearing. Dated: June 24, 2010. THOMAS MARC LITTON STEVEN L. WITTELS DAVID W. SANFORD ANDREW MELZER SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP MICHAEL RAM KARL OLSON RAM & OLSON LLP EDMOND CLARK LAW OFFICE OF EDMOND CLARK By: ___/s/ Steven L. Wittels_______________________ Steven L. Wittels Attorneys for Plaintiffs Joe Lewis Luque and Herman Richardson Dated: June 24, 2010. J. AL LATHAM, JR. JEFFREY D. WOHL JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI WILLIAM CORY BARKER PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP By: _____/s/ Jeffrey D. Woh/________________________ Jeffrey D. Wohl Attorneys for Defendants AT&T Corp., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and AT&T Communications of California, Inc.

LEGAL_US_W # 65033831.1

-2-

STIP. AND ORDER RE: CMC DATE U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LEGAL_US_W # 65033831.1

ORDER On the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS ORDERED that case management conference currently scheduled for June 25, 2010, will be continued to: x August 27, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. a date to be set by the Court that is at least 30 days after the Court rules on plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification, with a supplemented case management statement (as appropriate) filed one week before the conference. Dated: June __, 2010. 25

UNIT ED

__________________________________________ Charles R. Breyer United StatesORDERJudge District ED
R. Brey er

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

ER

N

D IS T IC T R

OF

-3-

STIP. AND ORDER RE: CMC DATE U.S.D.C., N.D. Cal., No. C-09-5885-CRB (JCS)

A

C

LI

FO

harles Judge C

R NIA

O IT IS S

NO

RT

H