Actuate Corporation v. International Business Machines Corporation et al

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Parties agree to participate in mediation, and are discussing Court-appointed or private process. Matter to be addressed the 4/2/10 case management conference. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 03/15/2010. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2010)

Case3:09-cv-05892-JCS Document25

Filed03/12/10 Page1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

RODGER R. COLE (CSB No. 178865) [e-mail] JOSEPH S. BELICHICK (CSB No. 229371) [e-mail] FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] DAVID L. HAYES (CSB No. 122894) [e-mail] ILANA S. RUBEL (CSB No. 221517) [e-mail] JENNIFER J. JOHNSON (CSB No. 252897) [e-mail] FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street - 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff ACTUATE CORPORATION

MICHAEL J. SHEPARD (CSB No. 91281) [e-mail] MICHAEL L. CHARLSON (CSB No. 122125) [e-mail] MAREN J. CLOUSE (CSB No. 228726) [e-mail] KRISTI ELDER (CSB No. 231996) [e-mail] HOGAN & HARTSON LLP 4 Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION and MRO SOFTWARE, INC.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ACTUATE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, MRO SOFTWARE, INC., a Massachusetts corporation, Defendants. Case No. CV 09 5892 JCS PARTIES' STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

PARTIES' STIP SELECTING ADR PROCESS

CASE NO. CV 09 5892 JCS

Case3:09-cv-05892-JCS Document25

Filed03/12/10 Page2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

Counsel have conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in mediation, and are discussing Court-appointed and private processes as well as scheduling issues. As the case progresses, the parties may also consider alternatives to mediation. The parties will address the timing of such mediation at the Case Management Conference currently scheduled in this matter for April 2, 2010. Dated: March 12, 2010 FENWICK & WEST LLP

By: /S/ Ilana S. Rubel Ilana S. Rubel Attorneys for Plaintiff ACTUATE CORPORATION Dated: March 12, 2010 HOGAN & HARTSON LLP By: /S/ Michael J. Shepard Michael J. Shepard Attorneys for Defendants IBM CORPORATION and MRO SOFTWARE, INC.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Ilana Rubel, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from any signatories indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this e-filed document. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 12th day of March, 2010 at San Francisco, California.

PARTIES' STIP SELECTING ADR PROCESS

1

CASE NO. CV 09 5892 JCS

Case3:09-cv-05892-JCS Document25

Filed03/12/10 Page3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

Dated: March 12, 2010 FENWICK & WEST LLP By _/S/ Ilana S. Rubel__________________ Ilana S. Rubel

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PARTIES' STIP SELECTING ADR PROCESS

2

CASE NO. CV 09 5892 JCS

Case3:09-cv-05892-JCS Document25

Filed03/12/10 Page4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

[PROPOSED ORDER] Pursuant to the above Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT ED
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

RT U O

03/15/2010 Dated: ____________________

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PARTIES' STIP SELECTING ADR PROCESS

3

CASE NO. CV 09 5892 JCS

A

C

LI

FO

seph C. Judge Jo

Spero

R NIA

_______________________________ Honorable Joseph C. Spero
NO

S

RT

H