Eng v. United Commercial Bank et al

Filing 57

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman vacating hearing 51 Motion for Attorney Fees (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2010)

Download PDF
Eng v. United Commercial Bank et al Doc. 57 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK, et al, Defendant(s). MARTIN ENG, Plaintiff(s), ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C09-5908 BZ ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING Having reviewed the papers filed in connection with defendant's motion for attorney's fees, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. By August 4, 2010, defendant shall file a supplemental brief citing to any authority it has for the proposition that a party who drafts a narrow attorney's fee provision in a standardized contract, such as the one at issue here which appears to limit an award of fees to "actions to collect a note," may seek to interpret it to permit that party to collect the fees defendant seeks here. As the Court reads both Hsu v. Abbara, 9 Cal.4th 863, (1995) and Pacific Custom 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pools, Inc. v. Turner Constr. Co., 79 Cal.App.4th 1254 (2000), in those cases the court was interpreting provisions which awarded fees to the prevailing party, and the issue generally before the court was to identify the prevailing party. Here, there is no issue over who prevailed; the issue is instead what is the scope of agreement between the parties with respect to fees. Section 1717, in the Court's view, merely makes the fee provision reciprocal; it does not expand its scope. 2. If plaintiff wishes, he may respond to the defendant's brief by August 11, 2010. 3. VACATED. required. Dated: July 27, 2010 The hearing presently scheduled for August 4, 2010 is The Court will scheduled a new hearing, if one is Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\ENG V. UNITED COMMERCIAL\ORD REQUIRING SUPPLMENTAL BRIEFING.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?