Marion v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION AND ORDER continuing Case Management Conference to 5/10/2010 04:00 PM in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San Francisco; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 3/11/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2010)

Download PDF
1 Linda M. Lawson (Bar No. 77130) LLawson@mmhllp.com 2 Allison Vana (Bar No. 228282) AVana@mmhllp.com 3 MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP 300 South Grand Avenue, 24th Floor 4 Los Angeles, California 90071-3185 Telephone: (213) 620-0300 5 Facsimile: (213) 625-1930 6 Attorneys for Defendant THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE 7 COMPANY OF AMERICA 8 9 10 11 12 JOHN MARION, 13 14 vs. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C09-05912 MHP [PROPOSED] ORDER UPON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Assigned to the Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel Complaint Filed: December 17, 2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; and 16 XEROX CORPORATION LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation to Continue Case Management 21 Conference ("Stipulation") between plaintiff JOHN MARION and defendant 22 THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, finds that good 23 cause exists to enter an order approving said Stipulation. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 LAW OFFICES MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP 0.0 1 Case No. C09-05912 MHP [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: The Case Management Conference currently set for March 29, 2010 is S DISTRICT TE C TA 4 continued to May 10, 2010, at 4:00 p.m. 6 7 Dated: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES RT U O UNIT ED S 3/11/2010 ER N F D IS T IC T O R MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP 0.0 2 Case No. C09-05912 MHP [PROPOSED] ORDER A C LI FO ari Judge M lyn H. P atel R NIA I Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel United States District Court Judge NO ORD T IS SO ERED RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?