Bookhamer et al v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.

Filing 317

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 316 to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document filed by Charles Thomas Martin, Jr., Anthony Bookhamer, Carl DiSilvestro, Lena J. Tryon. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/8/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MARY E. ALEXANDER, ESQ. (SBN: 104173) JENNIFER L. FIORE, ESQ. (SBN: 203618) SOPHIA M. ASLAMI, ESQ. (SBN: 262712) Mary Alexander & Associates, P.C. 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 1303 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 433-4440 Facsimile: (415) 433-5440 Email: malexander@maryalexanderlaw.com jfiore@maryalexanderlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 13 S. MARK VARNEY - 121129 GARRETT SANDERSON, III – 131026 Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 989-5900 Facsimile: (415) 989-0932 Email: gsanderson@cbmlaw.com 14 Attorneys for Defendant 9 10 11 12 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 22 ANTHONY BOOKHAMER, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, LENA J. TRYON; LENA J. TRYON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Victoria DiSilvestro; CHARLES THOMAS MARTIN, JR.; CARL DISILVESTRO, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, MARY DISILVESTRO, 23 Plaintiffs, 24 v. 25 SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC., 26 Defendant. 19 20 21 27 28 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 09-CV-06027 EMC (DMR) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT Pretrial Conf. Date: January 22, 2013 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: 5, 17th Floor Honorable Edward M. Chen Trial: Vacated STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT 1 The parties hereby stipulate, by and through their attorneys of record, that Exhibit 2 to 2 Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Sunbeam’s Motion in Limine No. 6 and Exhibit 6 to Plaintiffs’ Notice of 3 Manual Filing of Hard Copies, should be removed from the public filings because they contain 4 confidential information regarding Sunbeam Products, Inc. 5 6 The confidential information is the deposition transcript of William M. Rowe, Jr. in the Wilkinson v. Sunbeam matter. 7 On Friday, January 11, 2013, Plaintiffs inadvertently gave the confidential exhibit, Docket 8 Number 237-2, to Sunbeam for filing. Sunbeam filed it, but this was not Sunbeam’s error. The 9 parties had agreed that the moving papers and oppositions to each motion in limine would be filed 10 by the moving party. Plaintiffs stipulate that Sunbeam is not to blame for this and the error was 11 entirely Plaintiffs’. The parties, therefore, stipulate that the Court can permanently remove Exhibit 2 to 12 13 Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Sunbeam’s Motion in Limine No. 6, Docket Number 237-2 from the 14 public file and the ECF/Pacer website, as well as the Exhibit 6 to Plaintiffs’ Notice of Manual 15 Filing of hard Copies. 16 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: February 4, 2013 MARY ALEXANDER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 18 19 By: 20 21 George E. McLaughlin, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 22 23 /s/ Mary E. Alexander Mary E. Alexander, Esq. Jennifer L. Fiore, Esq. DATED: February 4, 2013 CARROLL, BURDICK & MCDONOUGH, LLP 24 By: 25 26 27 /s/ S. Mark Varney S. Mark Varney, Esq. Garrett Sanderson, III, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant /// 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Exhibit 2 to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Sunbeam’s Motion in Limine No. 6, Docket Number 3 237-2, and Exhibit 6 to Plaintiffs’ Notice of Manual Filing of Hard Copies shall be permanently 4 removed from the public file and ECF/Pacer website. 5 ISTRIC ES D T RT 11 dward Judge E NO 10 ER n M. Che A H 12 R NIA 9 D RDERE OO IT IS S LI 8 UNIT ED 7 RT U O T C ______________________________________________ TA THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN FO 2/8 DATED: ____________, 2013 S 6 N 13 D IS T IC T R OF C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?