Bookhamer et al v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.
Filing
77
ORDER re 76 Joint Discovery Letter Brief re Sunbeam's Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Untimely Supplemental Disclosures; Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion to Extend Discovery Cut-Off filed by Sunbeam Products, Inc., 73 Letter, fi led by Mary DiSilvestro, Charles Thomas Martin, Jr., Anthony Bookhamer, Carl DiSilvestro, Lena J. Tryon, 74 Joint Discovery Letter Briefregarding Sunbeam's Motion for Further Deposition of Mary DiSilvestro filed by Sunbeam Products, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 9/14/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2012)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ANTHONY BOOKHAMER,
8
9
Plaintiff(s),
v.
NOTICE AND ORDER SETTING
HEARING ON JOINT DISCOVERY
LETTERS
SUNBEAM PRODUCTS INC,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C-09-6027 EMC (DMR)
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
12
13
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
14
The court is in receipt of the parties’ joint letters regarding their discovery disputes. [Docket
15
Nos. 73, 74, 76.] The parties are ORDERED to re-file Docket No. 73 as a Joint Discovery Letter in
16
accordance with the court's standing order. [See Docket No. 54.]
17
In addition, you are hereby notified that a hearing regarding the disputes is set for September
18
27, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. at the U.S. District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 94612. For
19
courtroom number and floor information, please check the Court’s on-line calendar at
20
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov (click “Calendars - Judges' Weekly Calendars” link, then select Judge
21
Ryu’s calendar) or call Judge Ryu’s Courtroom Deputy, Ivy Garcia, at (510) 637-3639, one week
22
prior to the scheduled hearing.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: September 14, 2012
26
27
28
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?