Bookhamer et al v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.

Filing 89

ORDER re 85 Letter filed by Charles Thomas Martin, Jr., Anthony Bookhamer, Carl DiSilvestro, Lena J. Tryon. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/9/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
ANTHONY BOOKHAMER,

12
13

Plaintiff(s),

No. C 09-06027 DMR
ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' LETTER OF
OCTOBER 5, 2012 [DOCKET NO. 85]

v.

14

SUNBEAM PRODUCTS INC,

15

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

16
17

Before the court is Plaintiffs' request to submit a reply letter in response to the letter that

18

Defendant appended to court-ordered document submissions. [Docket No. 85.] The court notes that

19

the September 27, 2012 order which asked for the submissions stated the following:

20
21
22
23

Defendant shall submit (1) the Oklahoma state and family court records that
Defendant believes impeach Mary DiSilvestro's deposition testimony that she lacked
knowledge of Victoria DiSilvestro's drug use and neglect of her children, and (2) the
specific portions of Mary DiSilvestro's deposition testimony in which she asserts this
lack of knowledge; and Plaintiffs shall submit the specific portions of the deposition
testimony of Anthony Bookhamer's and Carl DiSilvestro's fathers which Plaintiffs
contend obviate Defendant's need to redepose Mary DiSilvestro.

24

[Docket No. 80.] The court granted neither party permission to submit an accompanying

25

letter. Nevertheless, Defendant submitted a letter containing approximately one page of

26

argumentation and eleven pages which highlight portions of the submissions for the court's

27

attention. Plaintiffs submitted a letter containing over a page of argumentation. The court

28

therefore permits Plaintiffs to file by October 12, 2012 a letter comparable to Defendant's,

1

which contains only descriptive – and not argumentative – information about Plaintiffs'

2

submissions.

ER

H

10
11
For the Northern District of California

R NIA

United States Magistrate Judge

9

United States District Court

. Ryu

aM
e Donn
JudgM. RYU
DONNA

RT

8

NO

7

Dated: October 9, 2012

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

A

6

TED

GRAN

LI

5

FO

S
IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

4

RT
U
O

3

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C