Coach Services, Inc. v. California Smiles et al

Filing 21

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 18 Stipulation filed by Coach Services, Inc. Signed by Judge James Larson on 4/14/10. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2010)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-06036-JL Document18 Filed04/13/10 Page1 of 3 4 HolL~ood, California 90038 Telephone: (323) 464-7400 5 Facsimile: (323) 464-7410 915 North Citrs Avenue 6 Attorneps for Plaintif 7 8 Coach Services, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 NORTHERN DISTRCT OF CALIFORNA CASE NO. CV 09-6036 JL 1 i COACH SERVICES, INC., a Maryland ) 2 Corporation, 13 vs. Plain6 ff, STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 14 CALIFORNIA SMILES, an unknown 15 business entity, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i STIPULA TJON TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGDIENTCONFERENCE Case3:09-cv-06036-JL Document18 Filed04/13/10 Page2 of 3 I WHEREAS Plaintiff Coach Services, Inc. fied the Complaint in this matter on December 28, 2009. 2 3 WHEREAS Plaintiff served the Summons and Complaint on Defendant California Smiles by substituted service on Januar 21,2010. The Summons and 4 5 Complaint were thereafter mailed to Defendant on February 9, 2010 pursuant to the 6 California Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant's time to file an answer or other responsive pleading was thereafter due on or before March 12, 2010. 7 8 WHREAS this Court issued an order on December 28, 2009 setting the Initial Case Management Conference for April 7, 201 O. 9 10 11 WHEREAS Rosenquest & Associates has only recently been retained by Defendant California Smiles and is currntly involved in a lengthy trial in San Fracisco Superior Court and requires additional time to prepare a response and to prepare for the Case Management Conference and Rule 26 deadlines. WHEREAS all other Defendants in this matter on whom Plaintiff has been able to effectuate service are currently in default, with the exception of Defendant Sandy Hui Xuan Wen, with whom Plaintiff 12 13 14 15 16 17 has reached a settlement. WHEREAS the paries have stipulated to, and this Court has approved, an is extension of time for Defendant California Smiles to file an Answer or responsive 19 pleading up to and including April 10, 2010. 20 21 WHREAS the paries have stipulated to, and this Court has approved, a continuance of the Case Management Conference and all other Rule 26 deadlines as follows: Current Date 22 23 Proposed Date 24 25 Last Day to Meet and Confer re Discovery Plan March 17,2010 Apnl 7, 2010 Apn121, 2010 April Lat Day to File Rule 26 Report Initial Case Management Conference March 31, 2010 26 27 28 April 7,2010 28, 2010 2 STrPULA TION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEI\IENT CONFERENCE Case3:09-cv-06036-JL Document18 Filed04/13/10 Page3 of 3 WI-llREAS the last day to meet and confer re a discovery plan precedes the date 2 3 on which Defendant California Smiles is required to file a responsive pleading, and the paa1ies are not able to engage in a meaningful Rule 26 meeting until a responsive 4 5 pleading is fied. WHEREAS the parties have been engaged in meaningful settlement discussions. 6 7 8 IT is HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Coach Services, Inc. and Defendant California Smiles, subject to this Court's approval, that the Case lv1anagement Conference and all other Rule 26 deadlines be extended as follows: 9 10 11 Current Date Proposed Date Last Day to Meet and Confer re Discovery Plan April 7, 2010 April 29, 2010 12 13 Last Day to File Rule 26 Report Initial Case Management Conference April 21, 2010 April 28, 2010 May 13,2010 I May 20,2010 June 2, 2010 14 15 DATED: April 13 ,2010 BLAKEL Y LAW GROUP 16 17 18 By: Brent H. Blakely Cindy Chan Attoriieps for Plaintif 19 20 2I DATED: 22 23 ~ NO Coach Services, Iiic. t , 2010 ROSENQUEST & ASSOCIATES 25 UNIT ED 24 26 27 28 April 14, 2010 C 3 OF D I S T CASE MANAGEMENT CONFEIU:NCF: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE I C T R N ER A LI FO Judge Ja mes Lar son R NIA S DISTR: CT By I TE C A Nils Rosenquest T Susan Bush Attorneys for Defendant Ca DERED lifornia Smiles SO OR IS IT S ~rf RT U O RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?