Coach Services, Inc. v. California Smiles et al
Filing
21
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 18 Stipulation filed by Coach Services, Inc. Signed by Judge James Larson on 4/14/10. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2010)
Case3:09-cv-06036-JL Document18
Filed04/13/10 Page1 of 3
4 HolL~ood, California 90038 Telephone: (323) 464-7400
5 Facsimile: (323) 464-7410
915 North Citrs Avenue
6 Attorneps for Plaintif
7
8
Coach Services, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
NORTHERN DISTRCT OF CALIFORNA
CASE NO. CV 09-6036 JL
1 i COACH SERVICES, INC., a Maryland
) 2 Corporation,
13
vs.
Plain6 ff,
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
14 CALIFORNIA SMILES, an unknown
15 business entity,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 28
i
STIPULA TJON TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGDIENTCONFERENCE
Case3:09-cv-06036-JL Document18
Filed04/13/10 Page2 of 3
I
WHEREAS Plaintiff Coach Services, Inc. fied the Complaint in this matter on
December 28, 2009.
2
3
WHEREAS Plaintiff served the Summons and Complaint on Defendant
California Smiles by substituted service on Januar 21,2010. The Summons and
4
5
Complaint were thereafter mailed to Defendant on February 9, 2010 pursuant to the
6
California Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant's time to file an answer or other
responsive pleading was thereafter due on or before March 12, 2010.
7
8
WHREAS this Court issued an order on December 28, 2009 setting the Initial
Case Management Conference for April 7, 201 O.
9
10
11
WHEREAS Rosenquest & Associates has only recently been retained by
Defendant California Smiles and is currntly involved in a lengthy trial in San Fracisco Superior Court and requires additional time to prepare a response and to
prepare for the Case Management Conference and Rule 26 deadlines.
WHEREAS all other Defendants in this matter on whom Plaintiff has been able
to effectuate service are currently in default, with the exception of Defendant Sandy
Hui Xuan Wen, with whom Plaintiff
12
13 14
15
16 17
has reached a settlement.
WHEREAS the paries have stipulated to, and this Court has approved, an
is extension of time for Defendant California Smiles to file an Answer or responsive
19
pleading up to and including April
10, 2010.
20
21
WHREAS the paries have stipulated to, and this Court has approved, a
continuance of the Case Management Conference and all other Rule 26 deadlines as
follows:
Current Date
22
23
Proposed Date
24
25
Last Day to Meet and Confer re Discovery Plan March 17,2010
Apnl 7, 2010
Apn121, 2010
April
Lat Day to File Rule 26 Report
Initial Case Management Conference
March 31, 2010
26
27
28
April 7,2010
28, 2010
2
STrPULA TION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEI\IENT CONFERENCE
Case3:09-cv-06036-JL Document18
Filed04/13/10 Page3 of 3
WI-llREAS the last day to meet and confer re a discovery plan precedes the date
2
3
on which Defendant California Smiles is required to file a responsive pleading, and the
paa1ies are not able to engage in a meaningful Rule 26 meeting until a responsive
4
5
pleading is fied.
WHEREAS the parties have been engaged in meaningful settlement discussions.
6
7
8
IT is HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Coach Services, Inc.
and Defendant California Smiles, subject to this Court's approval, that the Case
lv1anagement Conference and all other Rule 26 deadlines be extended as follows:
9
10
11
Current Date
Proposed Date
Last Day to Meet and Confer re Discovery Plan
April
7, 2010
April 29, 2010
12
13
Last Day to File Rule 26 Report
Initial Case Management Conference
April 21, 2010 April 28, 2010
May 13,2010
I May 20,2010 June 2, 2010
14
15
DATED:
April 13
,2010
BLAKEL Y LAW GROUP
16 17
18
By:
Brent H. Blakely Cindy Chan
Attoriieps for Plaintif
19
20
2I
DATED:
22
23
~
NO
Coach Services, Iiic.
t
, 2010
ROSENQUEST & ASSOCIATES
25
UNIT ED
24
26
27
28
April 14, 2010
C 3 OF D I S T CASE MANAGEMENT CONFEIU:NCF: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE I C T R
N
ER
A
LI
FO
Judge Ja
mes Lar
son
R NIA
S DISTR: CT By I TE C A Nils Rosenquest T Susan Bush Attorneys for Defendant Ca DERED lifornia Smiles SO OR IS IT
S
~rf
RT U O
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?