Calix Networks, Inc. v Wi-Lan, Inc.

Filing 88

ORDER extending patent rule deadlines re 87 Stipulation, filed by Calix Networks, Inc.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/22/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2011)

Calix Networks, Inc. v Wi-Lan, Inc.

Doc. 88

Case3:09-cv-06038-CRB Document87

Filed03/18/11 Page1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

Scott D. Baker (SBN 84923) Email: [e-mail] John P. Bovich (SBN 150688) Email: [e-mail] William R. Overend (SBN 180209) Email: [e-mail] Jonah D. Mitchell (SBN 203511) Email: [e-mail] Luisa M. Bonachea (SBN 267664) Email: [e-mail] REED SMITH LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105-3659 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff Calix, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CALIX NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. WI-LAN, INC., a Canadian Corporation, Defendant. Case No. 09-6038 CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PATENT RULE DEADLINES [Civ. L.R. 6-2 & 7-12]

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

REED SMITH LLP

Case No. C-09-6038 ­1­ US_ACTIVE-105772316.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PATENT RULE DEADLINES Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:09-cv-06038-CRB Document87

Filed03/18/11 Page2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Calix, Inc. ("Calix") and Defendant Wi-Lan, Inc. ("Wi-Lan"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to and request the Court as follows: 1. On October 29, 2010, Wi-LAN and Calix filed a Joint Case Management Statement

(Docket No. 78). In the Joint Case Management Statement, the parties agreed to various deadlines, including: Deadline for parties to comply with Patent L.R.4-2(a) (exchange of Preliminary Claim Construction & Identification of Extrinsic Evidence) Deadline for parties to comply with Patent L.R. 4-3 (file Joint Claim Construction & Prehearing Statement) 2. March 21, 2011

May 16, 2011

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

REED SMITH LLP

On November 5, 2010, this Court subsequently held a Case Management

Conference and set the claim construction hearing date to August 11, 2011 and tutorial date to August 9, 2011. See Minutes dated Nov. 5, 2010 (Docket No. 79). 3. The parties are exploring an informal resolution of this matter and believe that a

continuance of the deadlines set forth herein would facilitate further discussions and allow the parties additional time potentially to resolve this matter. Thus, the parties jointly agree and request that the deadlines set forth herein should be continued. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and propose the following deadlines: Deadline for parties to comply with Patent L.R.4-2(a) (exchange of Preliminary Claim Construction & Identification of Extrinsic Evidence) Deadline for parties to comply with Patent L.R. 4-3 (file Joint Claim Construction & Prehearing Statement) April 21, 2011

June 1, 2011

4.

The continuances requested herein will not affect any other deadlines set by the

court, including the date presently scheduled for the Claim Construction hearing.

Case No. C-09-6038 ­2­ US_ACTIVE-105772316.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PATENT RULE DEADLINES

Case3:09-cv-06038-CRB Document87

Filed03/18/11 Page3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

5.

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(1)-(3), this stipulated request is accompanied by the

Declaration of William R. Overend setting forth (a) the reasons for the requested rescheduling; (b) all previous time modifications in the case; and (c) the effect of the requested rescheduling.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, DATED: March 18, 2011. REED SMITH LLP

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: March 18, 2011.

By /s/ William R. Overend William R. Overend Attorneys for Plaintiff Calix Networks, Inc. MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

REED SMITH LLP

By /s/ Michael G. McManus Michael G. McManus (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendant Wi-LAN, Inc.

Case No. C-09-6038 ­3­ US_ACTIVE-105772316.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PATENT RULE DEADLINES

Case3:09-cv-06038-CRB Document87

Filed03/18/11 Page4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document for any signatures on this document indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) and I have on file records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request. DATED: March 18, 2011. REED SMITH LLP By /s/ William R. Overend William R. Overend Attorneys for Plaintiff Calix Networks, Inc.

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. C-09-6038 ­4­ US_ACTIVE-105772316.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PATENT RULE DEADLINES

REED SMITH LLP

Case3:09-cv-06038-CRB Document87

Filed03/18/11 Page5 of 5

1 2 3 4

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 7 8 9 10
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

UNIT ED

5

March 22 Dated: ____________________, 2011

ER

N

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

F D IS T IC T O R

REED SMITH LLP

Case No. C-09-6038 ­5­ US_ACTIVE-105772316.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PATENT RULE DEADLINES

A

C

LI

FO

J

arles R udge Ch

. Breyer

R NIA

____________________________________________ Honorable Charles R. Breyer ED ER United StatesIS SO ORD District Judge

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

IT

NO

RT

H