Calix Networks, Inc. v Wi-Lan, Inc.
Filing
96
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/7/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2011)
Case3:09-cv-06038-CRB Document95
1
7
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON
LLP
GREGORY S. GILCHRIST (State Bar No.
111536)
DAVID B. PERRY (State Bar No. 255925)
Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: 415.576.0200
Facsimile: 415.576.0300
Email: ggilchrist@kilpatricktownsend.com
dperry@kilpatricktownsend.com
8
Attorneys for Defendant WI-LAN INC.
9
Filed06/07/11 Page1 of 3
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
Robert A. Cote (pro hac vice)
Email: rcote@mckoolsmith.com
One Bryant Park, 47th Floor
New York, NY 10036
Telephone: (212) 402-9400
Facsimile: (212) 402-9444
2
3
4
5
6
10
11
12
13
14
15
Michael G. McManus (pro hac vice)
Email: mmcmanus@mckoolsmith.com
1700 K Street NW, Suite 740
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 370-8300
Facsimile: (202) 370-8344
16
17
Attorneys for Defendant WI-LAN INC.
18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
22
23
CALIX NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
Corporation,
Plaintiff,
24
25
26
Case No. 09-6038 CRB
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
vs.
WI-LAN, INC., a Canadian Corporation,
Defendant.
27
28
Case No. C-09-6038
–1–
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
Dallas 324454v1
Case3:09-cv-06038-CRB Document95
Filed06/07/11 Page2 of 3
1
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Calix, Inc.
2
(“Calix”) and Defendant Wi-LAN Inc. (“Wi-LAN”), by and through their respective counsel hereby
3
stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of all claims and counterclaims in this action as follows:
4
Plaintiff Calix hereby dismisses, with prejudice, all claims in the complaint filed on
5
December 28, 2009 [Dkt. No. 1] and Wi-LAN hereby dismisses, with prejudice, all claims set forth
6
in its First Amended Answer and Counterclaim filed October 20, 2010 [Dkt. No. 77].
7
For the avoidance of doubt, the aforesaid dismissals with prejudice encompass all claims and
8
counterclaims in this case, including all claims and counterclaims in the case entitled, Wi-LAN Inc. v.
9
Calix, Inc., which was initiated in the United States Federal District Court, Eastern District of Texas
10
(as Case No. 2:10-CV-117), and transferred to the United States Federal District Court, Northern
11
District of California as Case No. C-11-00004 EMC, and which has since been consolidated with
12
this action.
13
14
Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
15
16
17
Respectfully submitted,
DATED: June 7, 2011.
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
18
19
By /s/ Michael G. McManus
Michael G. McManus (pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Defendant
Wi-LAN, Inc.
20
21
22
23
DATED: June 7, 2011.
REED SMITH LLP
24
25
By /s/ William R. Overend
William R. Overend
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Calix Networks, Inc.
26
27
28
Case No. C-09-6038
–2–
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
Dallas 324454v1
Case3:09-cv-06038-CRB Document95
Filed06/07/11 Page3 of 3
1
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
2
3
I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document for any
4
signatures on this document indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) and I have on file records to
5
support this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon
6
request.
7
DATED: June 7, 2011.
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
8
By /s/ Michael G. McManus_________________
Michael G. McManus
Attorneys for Defendant
Wi-LAN Inc..
9
10
11
12
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
13
14
The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have
15
consented to electronic service are being served this date with a copy of this document via the
16
Court's CM/ECF system per General Order No. 45(IX)(B). Any other counsel of record will be
17
served by electronic mail, facsimile transmission, and/or first class mail on this same date.
/s/ Michael G. McManus__________________
Michael G. McManus
18
19
UNIT
ED
25
RT
26
har
Judge C
ER
28
A
H
27
reyer
les R. B
Signed: June 7, 2011
FO
24
ERED
LI
23
O ORD
IT IS S
NO
22
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
21
R NIA
20
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Case No. C-09-6038
–3–
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
Dallas 324454v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?