Banks.com, Inc. v. Hoult et al

Filing 72

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS HOULT AND MOXIESEARCH.COM. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 27, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2010)

Download PDF
Banks.com, Inc. v. Hoult et al Doc. 72 Case3:09-cv-06039-WHA Document71 Filed08/26/10 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EILEEN R. RIDLEY, BAR NO. 151735 eridley@foley.com MICHAEL A. NARANJO, BAR NO. 221449 mnaranjo@foley.com PATRICK T. WONG, BAR NO. 233222 pwong@foley.com FOLEY & LARDNER LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 555 CALIFORNIA ST, SUITE 1700 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-1520 TELEPHONE: 415.434.4484 FACSIMILE: 415.434.4507 ANDREW B. SERWIN, BAR NO. 179493 aserwin@foley.com FOLEY & LARDNER LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 402 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 2100 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3542 TELEPHONE: 619-234-6655 FACSIMILE: 619-234-3510 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF BANKS.COM, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION BANKS.COM, INC., ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) V. ) ) ROBERT HOULT, AN INDIVIDUAL, DALE ) GIESSMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL, ) MOXIESEARCH.COM, AN ENTITY FORM ) ) UNKNOWN, PROSTREAMMEDIA.COM, INC., AN ENTITY FORM UNKNOWN, AND ) DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, ) ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 3:09-CV-06039-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ROBERT HOULT AND MOXIESEARCH.COM [FED R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] CASE FILED: NOVEMBER 5, 2009 CASE REMOVED: DECEMBER 28, 2009 JUDGE: HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP SFCA_1750785.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF HOULT AND MOXIESEARCH.COM CASE NO. 3:09-CV-06039-WHA Dockets.Justia.com Case3:09-cv-06039-WHA Document71 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 August 27, 2010. Date: ______________________ Filed08/26/10 Page2 of 2 ORDER Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and the claims of Plaintiff Banks.com, Inc., against Defendants Robert Hoult and Moxiesearch.com are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to the foregoing stipulation waiving any and all claims that were or could have been brought in this action against each other relating to the facts alleged in the complaint and each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. IT IS SO ORDERED _______________________________________ HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SFCA_1750785.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF HOULT AND MOXIESEARCH.COM CASE NO. 3:09-CV-06039-WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?