Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

Filing 120

Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

Doc. 120

1 GERGOSIAN & GRALEWSKI LLP EDWARD M. GERGOSIAN (105679) 2 [e-mail] ROBERT J. GRALEWSKI, JR. (196410) 3 [e-mail] 655 West Broadway, Suite 1410 4 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 11 12 ALEXANDRA HADDAD, individually and on Case No. C 09-00958 RMW 13 behalf of all others similarly situated. [PROPOSED] ORDER RELATING CASES 14 Plaintiffs, 15 vs. 16 NETFLIX, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC., 17 WALMART.COM USA, LLC, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RELATING CASES Case No. C 09-00958 RMW
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Defendants.

1

Plaintiff Alexandra Haddad's Administrative Motion To Consider Whether Cases Should Be

2 Related ("Haddad Motion") was filed in this Court on March 17, 2009. Having considered the 3 4 5 6 Haddad Motion and good cause appearing, the Court hereby grants the Haddad Motion. IT IS ORDERED that Haddad v. Netflix, Inc., et al., Case No. 09-cv- 00958 (RMW) is hereby related to Resnick et al., v. Walmart.com USA LLC, Case No. 09-cv-00002-PJH. Haddad v. Netflix,

7 Inc., et al., shall be reassigned to the undersigned judge pursuant to local Rule 3.12 (f). 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

9 DATED: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RELATING CASES Case No. C 09-00958 RMW

-1-