Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

Filing 185

Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

Doc. 185

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

DAVID T. BIDERMAN, Bar No. 101577 JUDITH B. GITTERMAN, Bar No. 115661 M. CHRISTOPHER JHANG, Bar No. 211463 PERKINS COIE LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94111-4131 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. C O5-03649 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN CONNECTION WITH GOOGLE INC.'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Date: Time: Dept.: Judge: June 11, 2007 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 8 Honorable James Ware

15 v. 16 GOOGLE, INC., 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 05-03649 JW
41063-0023/LEGAL13271479.1

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Defendant Google Inc.'s ("Google") Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal in Connection with Google Inc.'s Reply to Plaintiffs' Supplemental Opposition to Google Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment was heard before this Court on June 11, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. Upon consideration of this Motion and the supporting Declaration of M. Christopher Jhang filed therewith, the Court finds there is good cause to grant Google's request to file the following documents under seal: 1. GOOGLE INC.'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; EXHIBITS A-C OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF M. CHRISTOPHER JHANG IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC.'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

2.

GOOD CAUSE having been shown, the Court finds that: (1) The parties possess overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of

public access to the record in the following documents; (2) (3) The parties' overriding confidentiality interests support sealing the record; A substantial probability exists that the parties' overriding confidentiality interests

will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed; (4) (5) The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and No less restrictive means exist to achieve this overriding interest.

20 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Google's Motion for Leave to File Documents 21 Under Seal is GRANTED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 05-03649 JW
41063-0023/LEGAL13271479.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

July 9 2007 DATED: ___________________
The Honorable James Ware United States District Judge -2-