Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.
Filing
19
EXHIBITS re 15 Response ( Non Motion ) Exh D filed byGoogle Inc.. (Related document(s) 15 ) (Kobialka, Lisa) (Filed on 5/29/2009)
Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.
Doc. 19
Case3:09-mc-80097-WHA Document19
Filed05/29/09 Page1 of 3
EXHIBIT D
Dockets.Justia.com
Case3:09-mc-80097-WHA Document19
Filed05/29/09 Page2 of 3
Freeborn & Peters LLP
April 30, 2009
By E-mail and U.S. Mail
AttoTneysatLaw
311 South Wacker Drive Suite 3000
Chicago, Ilinois
Scott T. Weingaertner King & Spalding LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003
Re: Intermec Technologies Corp. Subpoena to Google in Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc., 07-272-SLR-LPS
Dear Scott:
60606-6677
Tel 3 i 2.360.6000
Jeffrey M. Hansen
Partner Direct 312.360.6379
Fax 312.360.6594
jhansen~
freehornpeters.com
Than you for taking the time to speak with us yesterday by phone. As we discussed during the call, while what follows is a fair summation of the areas of information and testimony we are seeking, we are not waiving our right to seek all information permissible by law pursuant to our subpoena:
A.
Chicago
Springfield
Information regarding whether Google products/applications use a form of client-server architecture.
B. The manner in which the client and server make requests for data from
each other and how they respectively respond to such a request (for example, if the client application downloads from the server any executable code, including client-side scripting such as Javascript, AJAX, or Jscript, the maner in which the client application uses and executes that scripting code).
1. The manner in which the client side of a Google
product/application searches its own data, if at all, prior to requesting data from the server and examples of when and how this occurs.
C. The manners in which the client (handheld device/Palm device) and
server sides of a Google product use and store data (i.e. flat fie,
database, etc.).
D. F or mobile versions of Google applications, a list of protocols or
scripting languages that are supported.
Case3:09-mc-80097-WHA Document19
Filed05/29/09 Page3 of 3
Freeborn & Peters LLP
Scott T. Weingaertner April 30, 2009
Page 2
E. General information regarding the architecture used in Google
products/applications (for example, identifying the tiers and the functions each tier performs).
We understand that you wil initially focus on GMail, Google Maps, and Google Calendar given the logistical issues you stated exist.
We can also state, per your request, that it has not been Intermec's intention to join Google as a pary to this litigation and, per the court's scheduling order, the time for adding paries has lapsed.
If you have any questions regarding any of this, please do not hesitate to contact me
at 312-360-6379 or at jhansen(ßfreebornpeters.com. As we mentioned during the
call, we are facing a May 18, 2009 discovery deadline and wil need to be aware of Google's response sometime in the next few days in order to avoid having to seek relief in the appropriate court. We wil also need dates and times for a deposition (or depositions, based upon your statements to us that multiple individuals may be necessary to discuss Intermec's areas of inquiry) as soon as possible.
Sincerely yours,
JMH/jlg
1817606vl
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?