Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

Filing 22

EXHIBITS re 15 Response ( Non Motion ) Exh G filed byGoogle Inc.. (Related document(s) 15 ) (Kobialka, Lisa) (Filed on 5/29/2009)

Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

Doc. 22

Case3:09-mc-80097-WHA Document22

Filed05/29/09 Page1 of 2

EXHIBIT G

Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:09-mc-80097-WHA Document22

Filed05/29/09 Page2 of 2

From: To: Subject: Date:

Weingaertner, Scott "[e-mail]" Our Call re Intermec Subpoena of Google Thursday, May 07, 2009 1:27:44 PM

Jeff Thank you for your time today. I write to confirm our discussion intended to resolve our issues, as well as our understanding that we are in an informal mutual standstill on motion practice until we've been in contact again on our issues of scope. Also, thank you for letting us know that, if we go to motion practice, that Intermec will limit Intermec's motion to compel to the Northern District of California. We await your response on the issue of whether Intermec would limit its discovery to a single application. In addition, we would be receptive to limiting discovery scope to the issue of downloads to Palm Devices. Please let me know at your convenience where we stand and when we can complete our discussion. Thank you, Scott ______________________________ Scott T. Weingaertner King & Spalding LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Tel. [phone] Fax [phone] Sent from a wireless handheld device ______________________________