Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

Filing 228

Download PDF
Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc. Doc. 228 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The holding of this court is limited to the facts and the particular circumstances underlying the present motion. OR D E R, page 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES dba INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) GOOGLE, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) Case No.: C 05-3649 JW PVT ORDER RE DISCOVERY PLANNING On June 17, 2008, District Judge Ware issued an Order Following Case Management Conference in which he referred the parties to this Magistrate Judge to form a joint discovery plan following the parties meet and confer.1 On June 23, 2008, the parties contacted Judge Trumbull's chambers about scheduling a discovery conference. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall appear at 10:00 a.m. on July 8, 2008 in courtroom 5 of this court for a hearing regarding the parties' respective proposals for a discovery plan. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than July 2, 2008, each party shall file a brief setting forth what, if any, modifications should be made in this case to the presumptive limits on 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 discovery set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties may also include any other specific procedures or provisions they believe should be included in the discovery plan for this case. Dated: 6/24/08 PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL United States Magistrate Judge OR D E R, page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?