Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

Filing 34

Transcript of Proceedings held on May 15, 2009, before Judge William Alsup. Court Reporter/Transcriber Christine A. Triska, CSR, Telephone number (650) 743-8425. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerks Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction.After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/30/2009. (cat, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2009)

Download PDF
Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc. Doc. 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. NETFLIX, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC., and WALMART.COM USA LLC, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ARMOND FARIS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED Case No. 09-cv-0180 EDL 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On January 20, 2009, Plaintiff in Faris v. Netflix, Inc., et al., Case No. 09-cv-0180 EDL, filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related, pursuant to Local Rule 312. The Court, having considered the papers and pleadings on file, and good cause appearing, HEREBY GRANTS the motion. IT IS ORDERED that Faris v. Netflix, Inc., et al., Case No. 09-cv-0180 EDL, is hereby related to Resnick, et al. v. Walmart.com USA LLC, Case No. 09-cv-0002 PJH. Faris v. Netflix, Inc., et al. shall be reassigned to the undersigned judge pursuant to local Rule 3-12(f). Dated:___________________ By: ___________________________________ The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Judge 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?