Northside Hospital, Inc. v. Randell, M.D., P.C. et al

Filing 7

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 6 Stipulation filed by Google Inc.,. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on October 14, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:09-mc-80266-MHP Document6 Filed10/13/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 STEFANI E. SHANBERG State Bar No. 206717 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, C A 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Email: sshanberg@wsgr.com Attorneys for Third Party GOOGLE INC. FELICIA Y. FENG State Bar No. 184346 MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP 101 California Street 41st Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 267-4000 Facsimile: (415) 267-4198 Email: ffeng@mckennalong.com Attorneys for Plaintiff NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL, INC., 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court's Notice of Reference, Time and Place of Hearing of 20 October 7, 2009, a hearing has been set for Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Third Party Subpoena 21 and Compel Production of Documents by Third-Party Google Inc. ("Motion") for November 3, 22 2009 at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San 23 Francisco, California 94102; 24 WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court's Notice of Reference, Time and Place of Hearing of 25 October 7, 2009, Google Inc.'s ("Google") opposition is due October 13, 2009, and any reply to 26 the opposition is due October 20, 2009; 27 WHEREAS, the parties are engaged in discussions that may obviate the need for further 28 motion practice and believe good cause exists to extend the briefing schedule and hearing date STIPULATION CASE NO. MISC. 09-80266 MHP (EDL) MICHAEL D. RANDELL, M.D., and MICHAEL D. RANDELL, M.D., P.C., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 3:09-mc-80266-MHP (EDL) U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-0508-TCB STIPULATION REQUESTING TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR THIRD PARTY RESPONSE TO MOTION TO ENFORCE SUBPOENA Case3:09-mc-80266-MHP Document6 Filed10/13/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 for t his Motion; WHEREAS, the parties reserve all rights to defend and/or pursue this motion, if necessary; WHEREAS, no previous modifications have been made to the schedule in this matter; WHEREAS, this Stipulation will have no impact on the procedural schedule beyond extension of the current briefing schedule and hearing date; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiff Northside Hospital, Inc. ("Northside") and Google, through their respective counsel that the hearing currently scheduled before this Court for November 3, 2009, shall be rescheduled to November 10, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. or such other time as may be convenient for the Court. Google's opposition brief, currently due on October 13, 2009, shall be due on October 20, 2009. Northside's reply brief, currently due on October 20, 2009, shall be due on October 27, 2009. Dated: October 13, 2009 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: 17 18 19 20 21 22 By: 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 13, 2009 /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg Stefani E. Shanberg Attorneys for Third Party GOOGLE INC. MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP /s/ Felicia Y. Feng Felicia Y. Feng Attorneys for Plaintiff NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL, INC. Due to the Court's unavailability, the hearing PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. is continued to November 17, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. The parties' proposed briefing schedule is ordered. S DISTRICT , Dated: October 14 2009 TE C TA ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE RD United States MagistratIe IJuOdOgeERED T SS RT U O UNIT ED S STIPULATION CASE NO. MISC. 09-80266 MHP (EDL) ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI -2- FO Judge E lizabeth D. Lapo rte R NIA NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?