Martin v. Regency Centers, L.P.

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 10/28/10. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2010)

Download PDF
Martin v. Regency Centers, L.P. Doc. 16 1 SIDNEY J. COHEN, ESQ., State Bar No. 39023 SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 2 427 Grand Avenue Oakland, CA 94610 3 Telephone: (510) 893-6682 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff CAROLYN MARTIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CAROLYN MARTIN Plaintiff, V. CASE NO. C 10-00003 TEH Civil Rights STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL FRCP section 41 / REGENCY CENTERS, L.P;and 11 DOES 1-25, Inclusive, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation And Order For Dismissal Defendants. Plaintiff Carolyn Martin and Defendant Regency Centers, L.P., by and through their attorneys of record, file this Stipulation And Order For Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure section 41. Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on January 4, 2010. Plaintiff and Defendant have entered into a "Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement" which settles all aspects of the lawsuit. A copy of the "Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement" is incorporated by reference herein as if set forth in full. The "Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement " states in part that "The court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Settlement Agreement, and this Settlement Agreement shall be incorporated by reference in the dismissal as if set forth in full." Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate to the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the "Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement." Plaintiff moves to dismiss with prejudice the lawsuit against Defendant. Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant, who has answered the complaint, agrees to the dismissal. This case is not a class action, and no receiver has been appointed. This Stipulation and Order may be signed in counterparts, and facsimile or electronically transmitted signatures shall be as valid and as binding as original signatures. Wherefore, plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their attorneys of record, so stipulate. Date: 10/26/10 SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION /s/ Sidney J. Cohen _____________________________ Sidney J. Cohen Attorney for Plaintiff Carolyn Martin Date: 10/25/10 LEWIS, BRISBOIS, BISGAARD & SMITH LLC /s/ Helen Lee Greemberg Helen Lee Greenberg Attorney for Defendant Regency Centers, L.P. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED: The lawsuit against Defendant is dismissed with prejudice. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties' "Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement." D a t e : 10/28/10 UNIT ED S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O Thelton E. Henderson United States District Judge S Ju ER N D IS T IC T R OF Stipulation And Order For Dismissal -1- A C LI FO lton E. dge The Hender son R NIA NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?