Smith et al v. Leichtman et al
Filing
283
ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 282 STIPULATION Re Designation of Cy Pres Recipients. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/26/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2012)
Case3:10-cv-00010-JSW Document282 Filed10/25/12 Page1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Scott M. Pearson (SBN 173880)
spearson@seyfarth.com
Joseph Escarez (SBN 266644)
jescarez@seyfarth.com
2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500
Los Angeles, California 90067-3021
Telephone:
(310) 277-7200
Facsimile:
(310) 201-5219
Attorneys for Defendant
LEVINE LEICHTMAN CAPITAL PARTNERS,
INC. and LEVINE LEICHTMAN CAPITAL
PARTNERS III, L.P.
8
[additional counsel listed on signature page]
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
CHRISTINA SMITH, et al.,
15
Plaintiffs,
16
17
v.
LEVINE LEICHTMAN CAPITAL
PARTNERS, INC., et al.,
18
Defendants.
Case No. C 10-00010 JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE DESIGNATION OF CY
PRES RECIPIENTS
Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Judge:
November 16, 2012
9:00 a.m.
11, 19th Floor
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
19
Date Action Filed: January 4, 2010
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DESIGNATION OF CY PRES RECIPIENTS
CASE NO. C 10-00010 JSW
14958163v.1
Case3:10-cv-00010-JSW Document282 Filed10/25/12 Page2 of 5
1
WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement calls for certain cy pres payments to be made to
2
“one or more non-profit organizations jointly selected by the Settling Parties and approved by the
3
Court”;
4
WHEREAS, after good-faith negotiations, the parties have been unable to agree on which
5
non-profit organizations they should recommend to the Court to receive the cy pres payments;
6
and
7
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to submit competing proposals to the Court, which
8
shall determine which non-profit organizations should receive the cy pres payment under the
9
settlement.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties, through their respective
counsel of record, as follows:
1.
The Parties hereby agree that the Court may select the recipients of cy pres
payments under the settlement based on competing proposals from the parties;
2.
The parties shall submit their proposals to the Court no later than October 26,
2012, with such proposals to be no longer than 10 pages in length, exclusive of exhibits;
3.
Settlement Class Members may file responses to the proposals on or before
November 5, 2012, with such responses not to exceed ten pages in length.
18
//
19
//
20
//
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DESIGNATION OF CY PRES RECIPIENTS
CASE NO. C 10-00010 JSW
14958163v.1
Case3:10-cv-00010-JSW Document282 Filed10/25/12 Page3 of 5
1
I attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained
2
from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their
3
signatures on the document.
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5
6
DATED: October 25, 2012
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
7
8
By: /s/ Scott M. Pearson
Scott M. Pearson
Joseph Escarez
9
10
Attorneys for Defendants
LEVINE LEICHTMAN CAPITAL
PARTNERS, INC. and LEVINE
LEICHTMAN CAPITAL PARTNERS III,
L.P.
11
12
13
14
15
DATED: October 25, 2012
FREEDMAN & TAITELMAN, LLP
16
By: /s/ Michael A. Taitelman
Michael A. Taitelman
Joshua G. Blum
17
18
19
Attorneys for Defendants
NATIONAL CORRECTIVE GROUP, INC.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DESIGNATION OF CY PRES RECIPIENTS
CASE NO. C 10-00010 JSW
14958163v.1149561.1
Case3:10-cv-00010-JSW Document282 Filed10/25/12 Page4 of 5
1
DATED: October 25, 2012
PAYNE & FEARS LLP
2
3
By: /s/ Daniel M. Livingston
Daniel M. Livingston
Benjamin A. Nix
4
5
Attorneys for Defendants
MICHAEL C. SCHRECK and
BRETT STOHLTON
6
7
8
9
DATED: October 25, 2012
THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
10
DONOVAN AXLER, LLC
11
12
13
By: /s/ Noah Axler
Noah Axler
14
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
15
16
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties shall provide notice to Class Members by no later than October 29, 2012. By no later
17 than October 30, 2012, the parties shall file a document in which they describe how such notice was
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
18 provided. Pursuant to the stipulation as modified, IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
Dated: October 26, 2012
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DESIGNATION OF CY PRES RECIPIENTS
CASE NO. C 10-00010 JSW
14958163v.1149561.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?