Smith et al v. Leichtman et al

Filing 283

ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 282 STIPULATION Re Designation of Cy Pres Recipients. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/26/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-00010-JSW Document282 Filed10/25/12 Page1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Scott M. Pearson (SBN 173880) spearson@seyfarth.com Joseph Escarez (SBN 266644) jescarez@seyfarth.com 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, California 90067-3021 Telephone: (310) 277-7200 Facsimile: (310) 201-5219 Attorneys for Defendant LEVINE LEICHTMAN CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. and LEVINE LEICHTMAN CAPITAL PARTNERS III, L.P. 8 [additional counsel listed on signature page] 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 CHRISTINA SMITH, et al., 15 Plaintiffs, 16 17 v. LEVINE LEICHTMAN CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC., et al., 18 Defendants. Case No. C 10-00010 JSW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DESIGNATION OF CY PRES RECIPIENTS Date: Time: Ctrm: Judge: November 16, 2012 9:00 a.m. 11, 19th Floor Hon. Jeffrey S. White 19 Date Action Filed: January 4, 2010 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DESIGNATION OF CY PRES RECIPIENTS CASE NO. C 10-00010 JSW 14958163v.1 Case3:10-cv-00010-JSW Document282 Filed10/25/12 Page2 of 5 1 WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement calls for certain cy pres payments to be made to 2 “one or more non-profit organizations jointly selected by the Settling Parties and approved by the 3 Court”; 4 WHEREAS, after good-faith negotiations, the parties have been unable to agree on which 5 non-profit organizations they should recommend to the Court to receive the cy pres payments; 6 and 7 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to submit competing proposals to the Court, which 8 shall determine which non-profit organizations should receive the cy pres payment under the 9 settlement. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, as follows: 1. The Parties hereby agree that the Court may select the recipients of cy pres payments under the settlement based on competing proposals from the parties; 2. The parties shall submit their proposals to the Court no later than October 26, 2012, with such proposals to be no longer than 10 pages in length, exclusive of exhibits; 3. Settlement Class Members may file responses to the proposals on or before November 5, 2012, with such responses not to exceed ten pages in length. 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DESIGNATION OF CY PRES RECIPIENTS CASE NO. C 10-00010 JSW 14958163v.1 Case3:10-cv-00010-JSW Document282 Filed10/25/12 Page3 of 5 1 I attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained 2 from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their 3 signatures on the document. 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 5 6 DATED: October 25, 2012 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 7 8 By: /s/ Scott M. Pearson Scott M. Pearson Joseph Escarez 9 10 Attorneys for Defendants LEVINE LEICHTMAN CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. and LEVINE LEICHTMAN CAPITAL PARTNERS III, L.P. 11 12 13 14 15 DATED: October 25, 2012 FREEDMAN & TAITELMAN, LLP 16 By: /s/ Michael A. Taitelman Michael A. Taitelman Joshua G. Blum 17 18 19 Attorneys for Defendants NATIONAL CORRECTIVE GROUP, INC. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DESIGNATION OF CY PRES RECIPIENTS CASE NO. C 10-00010 JSW 14958163v.1149561.1 Case3:10-cv-00010-JSW Document282 Filed10/25/12 Page4 of 5 1 DATED: October 25, 2012 PAYNE & FEARS LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Daniel M. Livingston Daniel M. Livingston Benjamin A. Nix 4 5 Attorneys for Defendants MICHAEL C. SCHRECK and BRETT STOHLTON 6 7 8 9 DATED: October 25, 2012 THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 10 DONOVAN AXLER, LLC 11 12 13 By: /s/ Noah Axler Noah Axler 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 15 16 [PROPOSED] ORDER The parties shall provide notice to Class Members by no later than October 29, 2012. By no later 17 than October 30, 2012, the parties shall file a document in which they describe how such notice was PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 18 provided. Pursuant to the stipulation as modified, IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: October 26, 2012 The Honorable Jeffrey S. White 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DESIGNATION OF CY PRES RECIPIENTS CASE NO. C 10-00010 JSW 14958163v.1149561.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?