Smith et al v. Leichtman et al

Filing 343

ORDER GRANTING 342 Notice of Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/10/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2015)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-00010-JSW Document342-1 Filed02/09/15 Page1 of 3 1 Scott M. Pearson (SBN 173880) pearsons@ballardspahr.com 2 BALLARD SPAHR LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 800 3 Los Angeles, CA 90067-2909 Telephone: 424.204.4400 4 Facsimile: 424.204.4350 5 Attorneys for Defendants LEVINE LEICHTMAN CAPITAL 6 PARTNERS, INC. and LEVINE LEICHTMAN CAPITAL PARTNERS 7 III, L.P. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 CHRISTINA SMITH, ASHLEY HENDERSON, JANA SPERLING, 12 ESTATE OF TONI NEILSON, JESSICA SHOUSE, ALBERT LACHOWICZ ex 13 rel, JENNIFER PACZAN, and AMY LINDE, on their own behalf and on 14 behalf of others similarly situated, [Assigned to the Hon. Jeffrey S. White] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY Plaintiff, 15 16 CASE NO. 3:10-cv-00010 JSW v. 17 LEVINE LEICHTMAN CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC., LEVINE 18 LEICHTMAN CAPITAL PARTNERS III, LP., and LEVINE LEICHTMAN 19 CAPITAL PARTNERS III, LLC, MICHAEL SCHRECK, BRETT 20 STOHLTON and NATIONAL CORRECTIVE GROUP, INC (dba 21 ‘Corrective Solutions), Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DMWEST #11772063 v1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY Case3:10-cv-00010-JSW Document342-1 Filed02/09/15 Page2 of 3 ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the Notice of Substitution of Attorney, it is hereby ORDERED 3 that the law firm of Ballard Spahr LLP is substituted as counsel of record for 4 defendants Levine Leichtman Capital Partners, Inc.; and Levine Capital Partners III, 5 L.P. 6 10 DATED: Februrary __, 2015 7 Hon. Jeffrey S. White United States District Court Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DMWEST #11772063 v1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?