Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al

Filing 63

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING TO JUNE 25, 2010. The hearing on defendants' motion for sanctions is continued from May 14, 2010 to June 25, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 13, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MICHAEL A. LADRA (Bar No. 64037) Email: mladra@wsgr.com STEFANI E. SHANBERG (Bar No. 206717) Email: sshanberg@wsgr.com ROBIN L. BREWER (Bar No. 253686) Email: rbrewer@wsgr.com WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, C A 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC. ROBERT D. FRAM (Bar No. 126750) Email: rfram@cov.com SONYA D. WINNER (Bar No. 200348) Email: swinner@cov.com COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 591-6000 Facsimile: (415) 591-6091 ANDREW C. BYRNES (Bar No. 191516) Email: abyrnes@cov.com COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 632-4701 Facsimile: (650) 632-4801 Attorneys for Defendants TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, a California corporation, TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, a Japanese corporation, and TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, a Taiwanese corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION FORTINET, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, a California corporation, TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, a Japanese corporation, and TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, a Taiwanese corporation, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: C V 10-0048 MMC STIPULATED NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS [CURRENTLY NOTICED FOR MAY 14] AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING TO JUNE 25, 2010 WHEREAS Plaintiff Fortinet, Inc. ("Fortinet") and Defendants Trend Micro Incorporated, a California corporation ("Trend Micro U.S."), Trend Micro Incorporated, a Japanese corporation ("Trend Micro Japan"), and Trend Micro Incorporated, a Taiwanese corporation ("Trend Micro Taiwan") (collectively "Trend Micro") have agreed to a continuance STIPULATED NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS CASE NO: CV 10-0048 MMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 pursuant to Local Rule 7-7 of the hearing date, and related briefing schedule, for Defendants' Motion for Sanctions; WHEREAS no opposition has been filed; WHEREAS the parties believe it will conserve judicial and party resources for this motion to be heard after the motion to dismiss has been decided in this matter; and WHEREAS the Court has reset the hearing date for the Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for May 14, 2010, the current hearing date for Defendants' Motion for Sanctions. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel undersigned, that: The hearing on Defendants' Motion for Sanctions shall be continued to 30 days after an order on the Motion to Dismiss. Dated: April 9, 2010 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg Stefani E. Shanberg 16 17 18 Dated: April 9, 2010 19 By: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS CASE NO: CV 10-0048 MMC Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC. COVINGTON & BURLING LLP /s/ Andrew C. Byrnes Andrew C. Byrnes Attorneys for Defendants TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, a California corporation, TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, a Japanese corporation, and TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, a Taiwanese corporation PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED., with the exception that the hearing on the motion for sanctions is CONTINUED to June 25, 2010. A __ l 13, 2010 DATED: ___pri_________________ ____________________________ The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney -2- 3945884_1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?