Lawther v. OneWest Bank, FSB et al
Filing
61
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 60 TO CONTINUE DATE OF MEDIATION SESSION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/17/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2011)
*E-Filed 6/17/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Stephen C. Chuck, Esq. SBN 119612
schuck@foleymansfield.com
Tiffany M. Birkett, Esq. SBN 222390
tbirkett@foleymansfield.com
Foley & Mansfield PLLP
300 South Grand Ave., Suite 2800
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: (213) 283-2100
Facsimile: (213) 283-2101
Attorneys for Defendants
ONEWEST BANK, FSB and
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOHN T. LAWTHER,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
ONEWEST BANK, FSB, a federally)
chartered third; MORTGAGE
)
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
)
SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation,)
and DOES 1-100, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3-10-CV-00054 SC
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE
OF MEDIATION SESSION;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
26
Complaint filed: March 10, 2010
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF MEDIATION SESSION; [PROPOSED]
ORDER THEREON
1
TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES:
2
Whereas on May 20, 2011 the parties, by and through counsel, conferred with
3
the assigned mediator in this matter, Val Hornstein. The parties tentatively agreed to
4
hold June 29, 30 and July 1, 2011 with a 10:00 a.m. PST start time for a mediation
5
session.
6
Whereas Defendants OneWest Bank, FSB (“OneWest”) and Mortgage
7
Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”) and Defendant Aztec Foreclosure
8
Corporation (hereinafter collectively “Defendants”) requested approval to appear via
9
telephone at the mediation session in order to ease the burden and expense of
10
11
appearing at the mediation, but were denied.
Whereas due to the denial of the telephonic appearance, OneWest and MERS
12
13
are unable to appear at the currently scheduled date(s) set for mediation due to the fact
14
that its representatives are otherwise spread thin at various NACA events across the
15
country.
16
Whereas Plaintiff’s counsel filed a notice of unavailability for the week of July
17
25, 2011, and Defendants learned during the course of scheduling the mediation that
18
Plaintiff’s counsel will be unavailable for the period of July 6, 2011 through August 3,
19
2011.
20
Whereas this Court ordered the parties to complete mediation within one
21
hundred and twenty (120) days of April 5, 2011 (or August 3, 2011); however, based
22
on the aforementioned scheduling issues the parties are unable to complete mediation
23
prior to the currently scheduled mediation cut off date.
24
///
25
///
26
27
///
///
28
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF MEDIATION SESSION; [PROPOSED]
ORDER THEREON
1
THEREFORE, the undersigned counsel hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
2
1.
3
The current mediation cut-off date of August 3, 2011 can be continued to
September 9, 2011.
4
5
DATED: June 16, 2011
FOLEY & MANSFIELD, P.L.L.P.
6
7
BY: /s/ Tiffany M. Birkett
Stephen C. Chuck
Tiffany M. Birkett
Attorneys for Defendants
ONEWEST BANK FSB and
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
DATED: June __, 2011
16
/s/ BrÉóçå Davás
_____________________________
Breyon Davis
Attorney for Plaintiff
15
16
17
18
16
DATED: June __, 2011
WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
19
/s/ Sçåáa PäÉssÉí
_____________________________
Sonia Plesset
Robin Wright
Attorney for Defendant
Aztec Foreclosure Corporation
20
21
22
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
6/17
DATED:___________, 2011
_____________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
28
3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF MEDIATION SESSION; [PROPOSED]
ORDER THEREON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?