Lawther v. OneWest Bank, FSB et al

Filing 61

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 60 TO CONTINUE DATE OF MEDIATION SESSION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/17/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 6/17/11* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Stephen C. Chuck, Esq. SBN 119612 schuck@foleymansfield.com Tiffany M. Birkett, Esq. SBN 222390 tbirkett@foleymansfield.com Foley & Mansfield PLLP 300 South Grand Ave., Suite 2800 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 283-2100 Facsimile: (213) 283-2101 Attorneys for Defendants ONEWEST BANK, FSB and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN T. LAWTHER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) ONEWEST BANK, FSB, a federally) chartered third; MORTGAGE ) ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION ) SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation,) and DOES 1-100, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3-10-CV-00054 SC STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF MEDIATION SESSION; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 26 Complaint filed: March 10, 2010 27 28 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF MEDIATION SESSION; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 1 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES: 2 Whereas on May 20, 2011 the parties, by and through counsel, conferred with 3 the assigned mediator in this matter, Val Hornstein. The parties tentatively agreed to 4 hold June 29, 30 and July 1, 2011 with a 10:00 a.m. PST start time for a mediation 5 session. 6 Whereas Defendants OneWest Bank, FSB (“OneWest”) and Mortgage 7 Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”) and Defendant Aztec Foreclosure 8 Corporation (hereinafter collectively “Defendants”) requested approval to appear via 9 telephone at the mediation session in order to ease the burden and expense of 10 11 appearing at the mediation, but were denied. Whereas due to the denial of the telephonic appearance, OneWest and MERS 12 13 are unable to appear at the currently scheduled date(s) set for mediation due to the fact 14 that its representatives are otherwise spread thin at various NACA events across the 15 country. 16 Whereas Plaintiff’s counsel filed a notice of unavailability for the week of July 17 25, 2011, and Defendants learned during the course of scheduling the mediation that 18 Plaintiff’s counsel will be unavailable for the period of July 6, 2011 through August 3, 19 2011. 20 Whereas this Court ordered the parties to complete mediation within one 21 hundred and twenty (120) days of April 5, 2011 (or August 3, 2011); however, based 22 on the aforementioned scheduling issues the parties are unable to complete mediation 23 prior to the currently scheduled mediation cut off date. 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 /// /// 28 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF MEDIATION SESSION; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 1 THEREFORE, the undersigned counsel hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 2 1. 3 The current mediation cut-off date of August 3, 2011 can be continued to September 9, 2011. 4 5 DATED: June 16, 2011 FOLEY & MANSFIELD, P.L.L.P. 6 7 BY: /s/ Tiffany M. Birkett Stephen C. Chuck Tiffany M. Birkett Attorneys for Defendants ONEWEST BANK FSB and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DATED: June __, 2011 16 /s/ BrÉóçå Davás _____________________________ Breyon Davis Attorney for Plaintiff 15 16 17 18 16 DATED: June __, 2011 WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP 19 /s/ Sçåáa PäÉssÉí _____________________________ Sonia Plesset Robin Wright Attorney for Defendant Aztec Foreclosure Corporation 20 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 6/17 DATED:___________, 2011 _____________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 28 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE OF MEDIATION SESSION; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?