Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al v. Epson Imaging Devices Corporation et al

Filing 101

ORDER REGARDING ANSWERS TO ELECTROGRAPH'S AMENDED COMPLAINT by Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi, Ltd (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

KENT M. ROGER, State Bar No. 95987
HERMAN J. HOYING, State Bar No. 257495
JENNIFER L. CALVERT, State Bar No. 258018
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD.,
HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.
[Additional defendants and counsel
listed on signature pages]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

13
14
15

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case No. M 3:07-md-1827 SI; MDL 1827
Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-0117 SI

This Document Relates To Individual Case No.:
3:10-cv-0117 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING ANSWERS TO
AMENDED COMPLAINT

16
17
18
19

ELECTROGRAPH SYSTEMS, INC.;
ELECTROGRAPH TECHNOLOGIES, CORP.

Honorable Susan Illston

Plaintiffs,

20
v.

21
22

EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION,
et al.

23

Defendants.

24
25
26
27

WHEREAS, plaintiffs Electrograph Systems, Inc. and Electrograph Technologies, Corp.
(“Electrograph”) filed the above captioned lawsuit on November 6, 2009 (“Complaint”);

28
DB2/ 22697537.1

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-0117 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
ANSWERS TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

WHEREAS, defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices

2

(USA), Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Epson Electronics America, Inc., Sharp

3

Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic

4

Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Mobile Display Co.,

5

Ltd., LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics

6

Corporation America, Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.,

7

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and HannStar Display Corporation (“Stipulating Defendants”)

8

filed answers to the Complaint on March 15, 2010;

9

WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court’s order dated August 29, 2011 on Mitsui & Co.

10

(Taiwan), Ltd.’s (“Mitsui Taiwan”) motion for judgment on the pleadings for lack of personal

11

jurisdiction, which granted Electrograph “leave to amend its complaint to set forth its theory of

12

jurisdiction” over Mitsui Taiwan (MDL Dkt. No. 3395), Electrograph filed an amended complaint

13

on September 23, 2011 (“Amended Complaint”) identical to the Complaint with regard to

14

allegations concerning the Stipulating Defendants, but adding allegations regarding defendant

15

Mitsui Taiwan;

16

WHEREAS, response(s) to the Amended Complaint must be filed by October 10, 2011;

17

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

18

undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Electrograph, on the one hand, and the

19

Stipulating Defendants on the other hand, as follows:

20

1. Stipulating Defendants’ respective answers, filed on March 15, 2010, to the allegations

21

in Electrograph’s Complaint are hereby deemed responsive to the corresponding allegations in

22

Electrograph’s Amended Complaint and no further responsive pleading on behalf of the

23

Stipulating Defendants to Electrograph’s Amended Complaint shall be required.

24

2. To the extent Electrograph’s Amended Complaint contains any additional or

25

substantively revised allegations to which a response may be deemed to be required from the

26

Stipulating Defendants, such allegations are hereby deemed denied.

27
28
DB2/ 22697537.1

2

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-0117 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
ANSWERS TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

Dated: October 5, 2011

2
By: /s/ Kent M. Roger
Kent M. Roger (Bar No. 95987)
Jennifer L. Calvert (Bar No. 258018)
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7

Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi
Displays, Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic Devices
(USA), Inc.

8
9
10

By: /s/ Michael R. Lazerwitz
Michael R. Lazerwitz (PRO HAC VICE)
Jeremy J. Calsyn (Bar No. 205062)
Lee F. Berger (Bar No. 222756)
CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON
LLP
One Liberty Plaza
New York, NY 10006
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd.
and LG Display America, Inc.

18
By:
19
20
21
22
23
24

/s/ Christopher A. Nedeau
Christopher A. Nedeau
Carl L. Blumenstein
Allison Dibley
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants AU Optronics
Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation
America

25
26
27
28
DB2/ 22697537.1

3

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-0117 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
ANSWERS TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

By: /s/ Melvin R. Goldman
Melvin R. Goldman (Bar No. 34097)
Stephen P. Freccero (Bar. No 131093)
Derek F. Foran (Bar No. 224569)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6

Attorneys for Defendants Epson Imaging
Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics
America, Inc.

7
8
9

By: /s/ Hugh F. Bangasser
Hugh F. Bangasser (pro hac vice)
Ramona M. Emerson (pro hac vice)
K&L GATES LLP
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900
Seattle, WA 98004-1158
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14

Jeffrey L. Bornstein (Bar No. 99358)
K&L GATES LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)

15
16
17
18

Counsel for Defendant HannStar Display
Corporation

19
20

By: /s/ Robert Wick
Robert Wick (pro hac vice)
Neil Roman (pro hac vice)
Derek Ludwin (pro hac vice)
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
1201 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20004
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

21
22
23
24
25
26

Attorneys for Defendants Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung
Semiconductor, Inc. and Samsung Electronics
America, Inc.

27
28
DB2/ 22697537.1

4

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-0117 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
ANSWERS TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

By: /s/ John M. Grenfell
John M. Grenfell (Bar No. 88500)
Jacob R. Sorensen (Bar No. 209134)
Fusae Nara (pro hac vice)
Andrew D. Lanphere (Bar No. 191479)
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN
LLP
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6
7

Attorneys for Defendants Sharp Corporation and
Sharp Electronics Corp.

8
9

By: /s/ John H. Chung
John H. Chung (pro hac vice)
WHITE & CASE LLP
1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-2787
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14

Christopher M. Curran (pro hac vice)
Kristen J. McAhren (pro hac vice)
WHITE & CASE LLP
701 Thirteenth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005-3807
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

15
16
17
18
19

Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation,
Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba
America Electronic Components, Inc. and
Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.

20
21
22

By: /s/ Philip J. Iovieno
Philip J. Iovieno (pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
[phone]
[phone]
[e-mail]

23
24
25
26

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Electrograph Systems,
Inc. and Electrograph Technologies, Corp.

27
28
DB2/ 22697537.1

5

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-0117 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
ANSWERS TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

FILER’S ATTESTATION

2

I, Kent M. Roger, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to

3

file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby

4

attest that Michael Lazertwitz, Christopher Nedeau, Melvin Goldman, Hugh Bangasser, Robert

5

Wick, John Grenfell, John Chung, and Philip Iovieno concur in this filing.

6

/s/ Kent M. Roger____________________________
Kent M. Roger

7

Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi
Displays, Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices
(USA), Inc.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DB2/ 22697537.1

6

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-0117 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
ANSWERS TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

1
2
3
4
5

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation set forth above and pursuant to Rule 6-1(a) of the Civil
Local Rules, IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: October ___, 2011

6
By

7

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DB2/ 22697537.1

7

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-0117 SI; MDL NO. 1827
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
ANSWERS TO AMENDED COMPLAINT