Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al v. Epson Imaging Devices Corporation et al

Filing 343

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting (8040) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI Order re Revised Pre-Trial Schedule filed by Good Guys, Inc., Kmart Corp, Newegg Inc., Old Comp Inc., Radioshack Corp., Sears, Roebuck and Co., Target Corp (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2013)

1

[Counsel listed on signature page]

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
This Documents Relates To:
Best Buy v. AU Optronics Corp. et al,
Case No. 10-CV-4572,
Best Buy v. Toshiba Corp. et al
Case No. 12-CV-4114
Costco Wholesale Corporation v. AU
Optronics Corp. et al., Case No. 11-CV00058
Electrograph Systems, Inc. v. Epson
Imaging Devices Corp. et al., Case No. 10CV-00117

MASTER FILE NO. 07-m-1827 SI
CASE NO. 07-md-1827-SI
CLASS ACTION
CASE NO. 10-CV-4572
CASE NO. 11-CV-00058
CASE NO. 10-CV-00117
CASE NO. 10-CV-5452
CASE NO. 09-CV-5840
CASE NO. 10-CV-4945
CASE NO. 12-CV-4114
AMENDED STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE REVISED PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

Eastman Kodak Company v. Epson
Imaging Devices Corp. et al., Case No. 10CV-5452
Motorola Mobility Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corp. et al., Case No. 09-CV-5840
Target Corp, et. al., v. AU Optronics Corp.
et al.,
Case No. 10-CV-4945
MASTER FILE NO. 07-M-1827 SI
AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REVISED PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE

The undersigned liaison counsel, on behalf of all plaintiffs and defendants in the above-

1
2

referenced “Track 1B” action (the “Parties”), hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

3

WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference was held on March 15, 2013;

4

WHEREAS, the Parties submitted additional briefing to the Court on the pre-trial

5

schedule after the Case Management Conference;
WHEREAS, the Court issued an Order on April 2, 2013, regarding pre-trial exchanges;

6
7

and
WHEREAS, the counsel for the Best Buy entities and the Toshiba entities agreed that

8
9

good cause existed to modify the summary judgment schedule;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned counsel on

10
11

behalf of the Parties that the following pre-trial deadlines should be entered as an Order by this

12

Court:

13
Action

Plaintiffs’ Defendants’ Pl. Suppl.
Disclosure Disclosure
Exchange

Def.
Suppl.
Exchange

Filing
date

Hearing

Witness lists

14

Apr 30

May 7

May 14

May 21

June 25

Exhibit lists
Deposition
designations
Written
discovery
designations

May 21

June 4

June 14

June 21

June 25

July 9
July 9

May 21

June 4

June 14

June 21

June 25

May 21

June 4

June 14

June 21

June 25

15
16
17
18
19

July 9
July 9

20
21

Action

1st
2nd
3rd
Filing
Exchange Exchange Exchange date

Joint Set of Jury Instructions

May 28

June 10

June 18

June 25

Preliminary Statement &
Instructions

May 28

June 10

June 18

June 25

Joint Pretrial Conference
Statement

June 10

June 18

Jury Questionnaire

June 10

June 18

22
23
24
25
26
27

Hearing

June 25
June 21

June 25

28
-1-

MASTER FILE NO. 07-M-1827 SI

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REVISED PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE

1

Verdict Forms

2

In Limines:

June 18

June 21

June 25
June 18

Oppositions

3

Motions

July 9

July 2

4
Daubert Motions

Motions

May 3

Oppositions

May 17

Replies

June 12

May 24

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

In addition, the parties to the Best Buy v. Toshiba Corp. et al, Case No. 12-CV-4114, case
stipulate that the briefing schedule for summary judgment motions1 shall be as follows:
MSJ Filing deadline: June 5
Oppositions:

June 21

Replies:

June 28

Hearing:

July 9

13
14
15

ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories.

16
Dated: June 3, 2013

Respectfully submitted,

17
18

By:

19

Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Janet I. Levine (CA Bar No. 94255)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

/s/ Jerome A. Murphy

1

The parties set the deadline for filing Daubert Motions for May 14, 2013. The parties
have not filed any Daubert motions beyond those filed by Toshiba in Track 1B, and therefore do
not set forth a Daubert schedule as that deadline has passed. To the extent that any Daubert issues
arise in the course of ongoing discovery between Toshiba and Best Buy, the parties will inform
the Court. Best Buy will oppose any effort by Toshiba to file untimely Daubert challenges.

28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-2-

MASTER FILE NO. 07-M-1827 SI

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REVISED PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE

1
Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
pro
vice
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
pro
vice
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6

Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice)
pro
vice
R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice)
pro
vice
Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice)
(
ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP
1875 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-580-8821
8821
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10
11
12

15

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Target Corporation;
Sears, Roebuck & Co; Kmart Corp.;
RadioShack Corp., Old Comp, Inc.; Newegg,
Inc., Good Guys Inc.; and Motorola
Mobility, Inc.; and Liaison Counsel for
Direct Action Plaintiffs

16

By: /s/ Christopher M. Curran

17

r
Christopher M. Curran (pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
J. Mark Gidley (pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
Martin M. Toto (pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
John H. Chung (pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]

13
14

18
19
20
21
22

WHITE &CASELLP

1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Telephone:
[phone]
819
Facsimile:
[phone]
354

23
24
25

Attorneys for Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba
Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America
Electronic Components, Inc. and Toshiba
America Information Systems, Inc. and on
I
behalf of all Track 1B Defendant

26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-3-

MASTER FILE NO. 07-M-1827 SI
07

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REVISED PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE
PRE

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

Dated: ________________, 2013
6/11

5
6
7

Susan Illston, United States District Judge
DCACTIVE-22926180.1

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-4-

MASTER FILE NO. 07-M-1827 SI

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REVISED PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE