Crosthwaite et al v. Paul T. Beck Contractors, Inc
Filing
49
STIPULATION AND ORDER Case Management Conference set for 11/18/11 is continued to 3/9/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 11/14/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2011)
1 Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509)
Blake E. Williams, Esq. (SBN 233158)
2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110
3 San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 882-7900
4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile
mstafford@sjlawcorp.com
5 bwilliams@sjlawcorp.com
6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7 Andrew B. Kreeft, Esq. (SBN 126673)
Sergio H. Parra, Esq. (SBN 247682)
8 Bohnen, Rosenthal & Kreeft
787 Munras Avenue, Suite 200
9 Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 649-5551
10 (831) 649-0272 – Facsimile
akreeft@mbaylaw.com
11 sparra@mbaylaw.com
12 Attorneys for Defendants
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15 GIL CROSTHWAITE and RUSS BURNS, in their
respective capacities as Trustees of the
16 OPERATING ENGINEERS’ HEALTH AND
WELFARE TRUST FUND, et al.,
17
Plaintiffs,
18
v.
19
PAUL T. BECK CONTRACTORS, INC., a
20 California corporation; JAMES RAY BECK,
individually, and dba JRB GRADING & PAVING
21 aka JRB GRADING & PAVING, LLC., a Limited
Liability Company,
22
Defendants.
23
Case No.: C10-0151 SC
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT
STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR
CONTINUANCE
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
November 18, 2011
10:00 a.m.
1, 17th Floor
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
Honorable Samuel Conti
24
25
Plaintiffs and Defendants jointly request that the Case Management Conference scheduled
26 for November 18, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. be continued for approximately 45 days, as follows:
27
1.
On May 27, 2011, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint to include Defendants
28 James Ray Beck, individually and doing business as JRB Grading & Paving, also known as JRB
-1JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE
Case No.: C10-0151 SC
P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Paul T. Beck Contractors\Pleadings\C10-0151 SC - Joint Req to Continue CMC 111011.doc
1 Grading & Paving, LLC.
2
2.
On June 24, 2011, Defendants filed their Answer to the Amended Complaint.
3
3.
On July 15, 2011, Plaintiffs filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether
4 Case No. C11-0454 PJH (Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. James Ray Beck,
5 individually, and dba JRB Grading & Paving aka JRB Grading & Paving, LLC) should be Related
6 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12.
7
4.
On July 22, 2011, the Court issued a Related Case Order, relating the two matters
8 before the Honorable Samuel Conti.
9
5.
The Parties are currently engaged in active settlement discussions and are working
10 toward an informal resolution of this Matter. It is the consensus of the Parties that if a settlement
11 can be reached outside of Court, it will be reached in the next several weeks. All Defendants are
12 aware that if a resolution cannot be reached informally, Plaintiffs will file a Motion for Summary
13 Judgment against all Defendants named in the Amended Complaint.
14
6.
Given the state of the Parties’ settlement discussions, there is nothing to discuss at a
15 Case Management Conference at the present time.
16
7.
We therefore jointly request that the Case Management Conference be continued
17 for approximately 45 days to allow the Parties time to conclude their settlement discussions. All
18 related deadlines (such as Rule 26 disclosures) shall also be continued along with the Case
19 Management Conference.
20 Dated: November 10, 2011
21
By: _____________/s/_________________
Blake E. Williams
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
22
23
24 Dated: November 10, 2011
25
26
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON
LAWCORPORATION
BOHNEN, ROSENTHAL & KREEFT
By: _____________/s/_________________
Sergio H. Parra
Attorneys for Defendants
27
28
-2JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE
Case No.: C10-0151 SC
P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Paul T. Beck Contractors\Pleadings\C10-0151 SC - Joint Req to Continue CMC 111011.doc
1 IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
The
currently
set
Case
Management
Conference
March 9, 2012
10:00 a.m.
3 __________________________ at __________________.
is
hereby
continued
to
All related deadlines are extended
4 accordingly.
UNIT
ED
onti
Judge S
H
LI
RT
ER
9
FO
amuel C
NO
8
R NIA
________________________________
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES
A
7
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
11/14/11
6 Date: _________________________
S
5
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE
Case No.: C10-0151 SC
P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Paul T. Beck Contractors\Pleadings\C10-0151 SC - Joint Req to Continue CMC 111011.doc
1
PROOF OF SERVICE:
2 I, the undersigned, declare:
3
I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of
4 eighteen and not a party to this action. My business address is 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110,
5 San Francisco, California 94104.
6
On November 10, 2011, I served the following document(s) on the parties to this action in
7 the manner described below:
8
9
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE
XX
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ELECTRONICALLY by causing said document to be electronically filed using the
Court’s Electronic Court Filing (“ECF”) System and service was completed by electronic
means by transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing on the registered participants of the
ECF System.
To:
Andrew B. Kreeft, Esq.
Sergio H. Parra, Esq.
Bohnen, Rosenthal & Kreeft
787 Munras Avenue, Suite 200
Monterey, California 93940
VIA ECF
Attorneys for Defendants
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this
declaration was executed on this 10th day of November, 2011, at San Francisco, California.
19
/s/
Qui X. Lu
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Paul T. Beck Contractors\Pleadings\C10-0151 SC - Joint Req to Continue CMC 111011.doc
-1PROOF OF SERVICE
Case No.: C10-0151 SC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?