Dabney v. Sisto
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 4/1/2010. (Attachments: # 1 CertServ)(awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ARTARLIO DABNEY, Petitioner, v. D. K. SISTO, warden, Respondent. /
No. C 10-154 MHP (pr) ORDER OF TRANSFER
Artarlio Dabney filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus to challenge the denial of parole by the Board of Parole Hearings. Dabney is incarcerated at the California State Prison - Solano in Vacaville, California, where the hearing took place at which parole was denied. The prison is in Solano County, which is within the venue of the Eastern District of California. Venue is proper in a habeas action in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); however, the district of confinement is the preferable forum to review the execution of a sentence, such as a time credit calculation or parole denial claim. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Because petitioner is confined in the Eastern District of California and challenging the execution of his sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b), and in the interests of justice, this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The clerk shall transfer this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 1, 2010 Marilyn Hall Patel United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?