Goldstein v. City of Santa Rosa

Filing 59

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT TO 1:30 P.M. CALENDAR (Correction of hearing time). Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 10/19/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2010)

Download PDF
Goldstein v. City of Santa Rosa Doc. 59 Case3:10-cv-00163-JSW Document55-3 Filed10/04/10 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 Martin Goldstein 3978 New Zealand Ave. Santa Rosa, Ca 95407 707-236-7868 In pro se 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARTIN GOLDSTEIN 14 Plaintiffs, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 vs. CITY OF SANTA ROSA, And DOES 1-10 inclusive. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV10-0163 JSW GRANTING UNOPPOSED AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER MOTION TO AMEND AND CONTINUNG CASE Judge Jeffrey White MANAGEMENT TO AFTERNOON CALENDAR Date: November 12, 2010 Time: 9:00am Ctrm: 11 /// /// /// __________________________________________________________________________________________ Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint - 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case3:10-cv-00163-JSW Document55-3 Filed10/04/10 Page2 of 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Plaintiff MARTIN GOLDSTEIN is granted leave 1 to amend his complaint and file a Second Amended Complaint adding DOE and substitute the 2 3 4 5 name of one DOE defendant for Richard Boehm, an individual officer of the Santa Rosa Police Department. The clerk shall file the proposed amended complaint attached to Plaintiff's motion. The hearing date of December 17, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. is HEREBY VACATED. 6 7 8 9 10 1:30 p.m. The case management conference is CONTINUED until December 17, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. Case management statements shall be filed no later than December 10, 2010. 19 Dated: October ____, 2010 _____________________________ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 __________________________________________________________________________________________ Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint - 2 Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?