Luce et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company, Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT CBS CORPORATION'S APPLICATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS. No later than February 12, 2010, opposition to the application for a stay of proceedings, if any, shall be filed. No later than February 19, 2010 , any reply shall be filed. As of February 19, 2010 or the date on which a reply is filed, whichever is earlier, the Court will take the application under submission. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 3, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHARLES LUCE and JEAN LUCE, Plaintiffs, v. A. W. CHESTERON COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants / No. C-10-0174 MMC ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT CBS CORPORATION'S APPLICATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS United States District Court Before the Court is defendant CBS Corporation's ("CBS") "Ex Parte Application" for "An Order Staying All Proceedings Pending A Decision By The Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation, Or In The Alternative, To Shorten Time For A Hearing On The Motion To Stay," filed January 20, 2010.1 No party has filed a response thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court will hear the application on shortened time, as follows:2 1. No later than February 12, 2010, opposition to the application for a stay of proceedings, if any, shall be filed. The above-titled action was reassigned to the undersigned on January 28, 2010. Although the instant application is not appropriate for consideration on an ex parte basis, see Civil L.R. 7-10, and should have been noticed as a motion, see Civil L.R. 7-2, the Court, in lieu of striking the filing, has set a briefing schedule. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. No later than February 19, 2010, any reply shall be filed. 3. As of February 19, 2010 or the date on which a reply is filed, whichever is earlier, the Court will take the application under submission. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 3, 2010 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?