Ambrose v. Astrue

Filing 15

ORDER ON STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 14, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TAMARA A. AMBROSE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. / ORDER ON STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE No. C 10-00234 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The undersigned has reviewed the parties' stipulation seeking additional time for plaintiff to file her summary judgment motion in this social security appeal. The reasons underlying the request, however, do not warrant any extension, let alone the 30-day extension requested. Specifically, the fact that counsel have taken on too much work and have other cases that "require briefing prior to this date" is not a legitimate reason to extend court-ordered deadlines. Since the motion deadline is imminent, however, the undersigned will grant plaintiff until JUNE 28, 2010, to file the summary judgment motion. No further extensions will be granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 14, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?