Miller v. Facebook, Inc. et al

Filing 138

STIPULATION and Order Shortening Time to Hear Motion to Set Aside Default by Yao Wei Yeo. (Holland, Andrew) (Filed on 5/4/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Stephen C. Gerrish/Bar No. 061253 sgerrish@thoits.com Andrew P. Holland/Bar No. 224737 aholland@thoits.com THOITS, LOVE, HERSHBERGER & McLEAN A Professional Law Corporation 285 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 300 Palo Alto, California 94301 Telephone: (650) 327-4200 Facsimile: (650) 325-5572 Attorneys for Defendant Yao Wei Yeo 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 11 285 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 300 PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94301 (650) 327-4200 THOITS, LOVE, HERSHBERGER & McLEAN 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 DANIEL M. MILLER, No. 3:10-CV-00264 (WHA) STIPULATION AND ORDER SHORTENING TIME TO HEAR YAO WEI YEO’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT Plaintiff, 14 15 v. 16 FACEBOOK, INC. and YAO WEI YEO, 17 Defendants. 18 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiff Daniel M. Miller (“Plaintiff”) and defendant 20 Yao Wei Yeo (“Defendant”), through their respective attorneys of record herein, that 21 Defendant’s motion to set aside default may be heard on shortened time pursuant to Local Rule 22 6-2. 23 The parties hereby stipulate that Defendant’s motion to set aside default may be heard on 24 May 19, 2011, on the same day and at the same time as Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default 25 judgment, now scheduled to be heard on said date at 8:00 a.m., in Courtroom 9, before the 26 Honorable William Alsup. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a)(1)-(3), the parties hereby submit the 259537.001/280541 1 STIPULATION 1 following: indicated. Defendant Yao Wei Yeo only recently learned of this motion, as more fully set forth 5 in his declaration filed in connection with his motion to set aside his default. Defendant Yao 6 Wei Yeo believes there is good cause to set aside the default against him. This case is set for 7 jury trial on June 13, 2011, and for Pre-Trial Conference on June 1, 2011. In order to resolve 8 the pending issues regarding plaintiff’s request to enter a default judgment and defendant’s 9 request to set aside the underlying default in an efficient manner, in advance of the pending 10 dates, the parties agreed that the plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions should be heard at the same 11 A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION Plaintiff’s pending motion for entry of a default judgment is currently set for the date 4 285 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 300 PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94301 (650) 327-4200 A. Reasons for Shortening Time 3 THOITS, LOVE, HERSHBERGER & McLEAN 2 time, on the date plaintiff’s motion is now set to be heard. Defendant Yao Wei Yeo’s motion to 12 set aside the default would otherwise be heard on 35 days notice, which would result in a 13 hearing after the hearing on the plaintiff’s motion and after the date of the Pre-Trial conference, 14 which the parties believe is not efficient or expeditious. 15 B. Previous Time Modifications 16 There have been no other time modifications in the case involving or between plaintiff 17 and defendant Yao Wei Yeo. A previous Stipulation enlarging time was made between plaintiff 18 and defendant Facebook, Inc. on or about December 30, 2010, regarding certain dates and 19 deadlines. 20 C. Effect of Shortening Time on Current Court Schedule 21 No dates currently set for pending events are affected by this stipulation. The only effect 22 of this stipulation is the addition of defendant Yao Wei Yeo’s motion to set aside the default 23 against him to the court’s calendar on May 19, 2011. It is not determined what if any impact 24 the disposition of the motions might have on the court’s current schedule for Pre-Trial 25 Conference and Trial. 26 This stipulation is accompanied by the Declaration of Andrew P. Holland pursuant to 259537.001/280541 2 STIPULATION 1 Local Rule 6-2(a). 2 By making this stipulation/motion to shorten the time required for the hearing on his 3 motion to set aside default, Defendant Yao Wei Yeo does not hereby intend to make a general 4 appearance, submit to the jurisdiction of this court or waive any defense that this court may not 5 exercise personal jurisdiction over him or that he was not properly served with summons and 6 complaint. Defendant Yao Wei Yeo expressly reserves said defenses. there is good cause to deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment or grant Defendant Yao Wei 10 Yeo’s motion to set aside default nor does the Plaintiff, by making this stipulation, intend to 11 A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION Defendant Yao Wei Yeo’s motion to set aside default, Plaintiff does not hereby concede that 9 285 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 300 PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94301 (650) 327-4200 By making this stipulation/motion to shorten the time required for the hearing on 8 THOITS, LOVE, HERSHBERGER & McLEAN 7 waive any arguments he may have for or against said motions, respectively. 12 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: May 4, 2011. THOITS, LOVE, HERSHBERGER & McLEAN 14 15 By 16 s/ Andrew P. Holland Andrew P. Holland Attorneys for Defendant Yao Wei Yeo 17 18 Dated: May 4, 2011. HENINGER GARRISON DAVIS, LLC 19 20 By s/ Brian D. Hancock Brian D. Hancock Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel M. Miller 21 22 23 Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, section X(B), I attest under 24 penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its 25 signatory. 26 Dated: May 4, 2011. 259537.001/280541 3 STIPULATION Respectfully Submitted 1 2 By 3 s/ Andrew P. Holland Andrew P. Holland Attorneys for Defendant Yao Wei Yeo 4 5 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May ___, 2011. 7 8 Honorable William Alsup United States District Court Judge 9 A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 11 285 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 300 PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94301 (650) 327-4200 THOITS, LOVE, HERSHBERGER & McLEAN 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 259537.001/280541 4 STIPULATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?