Miller v. Facebook, Inc. et al

Filing 153

NOTICE RE JUNE 9 HEARING. Signed by Judge Alsup on May 31, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DANIEL M. MILLER,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,

12

No. C 10-00264 WHA

v.

NOTICE TO PARTIES RE
JUNE 9, 2011, HEARING

13

FACEBOOK, INC. and YAO WEI YEO,

14

Defendants.
/

15
16
17

The parties should be prepared to address the following issues at the June 9 hearing. The
parties are advised that there will be limited time.

18
19

(1)

What, exactly, was said during the July 2010 phone conversation between Facebook

20

attorneys, including Craig Clark, and defendant? Did Facebook’s attorneys mention

21

anything about defendant not needing to respond to the lawsuit unless he had personally

22

received any documents or that could be construed as such?

23

(2)

24
25

Is there any possibility of identifying the other Facebook attorney who participated in the
July 2010 phone conversation and obtaining a declaration from that attorney?

(3)

Did defendant Yeo read anything on the internet while monitoring this lawsuit that would

26

have led him to believe that he needed to respond to the lawsuit before he retained counsel

27

and filed his motion to set aside default?

28

1
2

(4)

What were the exact nature and extent of defendant’s contacts with California, specifically
with reference to any agreements with California corporations?

3
4

Dated: May 31, 2011.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2