Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. v. Toyama Partners, LLC et al
Filing
340
ORDER re #321 Letter Brief filed by Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 10/27/2011. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2011)
1
2
3
NOT FOR CITATION
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
EUREKA DIVISION
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
No. CV 10-0325 SI (NJV)
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO
REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS
Plaintiff,
v.
(Doc. No. 321)
TOYAMA PARTNERS LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
/
15
16
17
18
The district court has referred the parties’ discovery motions and all future discovery matters
to this Court for determination. Doc. Nos. 202, 248.
Plaintiff asks this Court to compel Defendants to provide further responses to four requests
19
for admission. See Doc. No. 321. Defendants argue the requests are improper for a number of
20
reasons. Doc. No. 327. The Court disagrees and orders Defendants to supplement their responses to
21
Requests for Admission (“RFAs”) Nos. 8 through 11. Defendants have a duty to undertake a good
22
faith investigation of sources reasonably available to them when responding to discovery.
23
Defendants thus can review correspondence between their counsel and Plaintiff’s counsel (which is
24
not privileged, and which is under their control) which documents the conversations and events at
25
issue in RFAs 8 and 9. Defendants can review similar correspondence, production cover letters, or
26
production logs to respond to RFAs 10 and 11.
27
28
1
2
If after their good faith investigation they remain unable to admit or deny the requests, they
can respond that they lack information or belief.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED
5
Dated: October 27, 2011
6
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?