Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. v. Toyama Partners, LLC et al
Filing
424
ORDER Jury Selection set for 4/16/2012 08:30 AM before Hon. Susan Illston. Jury Trial set for 4/16/2012 08:30 AM before Hon. Susan Illston. Pretrial Conference set for 4/3/2012 03:30 PM before Hon. Susan Illston. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2011)
Case3:10-cv-00325-SI Document422
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DAVID F. FAUSTMAN (State Bar No. 81862)
FOX ROTHSCHILD
235 Pine Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 364-5540
Facsimile: (415) 391-4436
JAY D. MARINSTEIN (Pro Hac Vice)
PATRICK L. ABRAMOWICH (Pro Hac Vice)
FOX ROTHSCHILD th
625 Liberty Avenue, 29 Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
Telephone: (412) 391-1334
Facsimile: (412) 391-6984
SCOTT R. KIPNIS (Pro Hac Vice)
HOFHEIMER GARTLIR & GROSS, LLP
530 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
Telephone: (212) 897-7898
Facsimile: (212) 897-4999
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.,
16
Plaintiff,
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Attorneys for Attorneys for Defendants and
Counterclaimants TOYAMA PARTNERS,
LLC; PETER PAU d/b/a SAND HILL
PROPERTY COMPANY, a sole
proprietorship; PETER PAU, in his individual
capacity and as partner of SAND HILL
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY;
SUSANNA PAU, in her capacity as partner of
SAND HILL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
COMPANY; SAND HILL PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT COMPANY, and
CAPELLA-MOWRY, LLC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
18
LISA C. ROBERTS (State Bar No. 111982)
PETER M. REHON (State Bar No. 100123)
REHON & ROBERTS
A Professional Corporation
830 The Alameda
San Jose, CA 95126
Telephone: (408) 494-0900
Facsimile: (408) 494-0909
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
13
15
Filed12/16/11 Page1 of 3
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND SET A
NEW DATE FOR TRIAL
____________________________________
v.
TOYAMA PARTNERS, LLC; PETER PAU
d/b/a SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY,
a sole proprietorship; PETER PAU, in his
individual capacity and as partner of SAND
HILL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
COMPANY; SUSANNA PAU, in her
capacity as partner of SAND HILL
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY;
SAND HILL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
COMPANY, and CAPELLA-MOWRY,
LLC,
Judge:
Case No.
Honorable Susan Illston
CV-10-0325 SI
Complaint filed:
Trial Date:
January 22, 2010
February 6, 2012
Defendants.
27
28
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
AND SET A NEW DATE FOR TRIAL
PT1 551531v2 10/06/11
PT1 561204v2 12/15/11
CASE NO: CV-10-0325 SI
Case3:10-cv-00325-SI Document422
1
Filed12/16/11 Page2 of 3
Plaintiff Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (“Dollar Tree”) and Defendants Toyama Partners, LLC
2
(“Toyama”), Peter Pau individually and d/b/a Sand Hill Property Company (“Pau”), Susanna Pau
3
(“Ms. Pau”), Sand Hill Property Management Company (“SH Management”), and Capella-
4
Mowry, LLC (“Capella”) (collectively, “Defendants” and, with Dollar Tree, the “Parties”), by
5
their undersigned counsel, file the following Stipulation to Reschedule Pretrial Conference and
6
Set a New Date for Trial (“Stipulation”), stating as follows:
7
1.
Currently, the Pretrial Conference in the above-captioned litigation is scheduled
8
for January 24, 2012, and trial is set to begin on February 6, 2012. See Dkt. No. 337. Pursuant
9
to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions, a number of pretrial submissions are due January 10, 2012,
10
including, inter alia, the Pretrial Conference Statement, Proposed Jury Instructions, and
11
Motions in Limine. See Dkt. No. 280-1.
12
2.
On December 13, 2011, a Clerk’s Notice was issued rescheduling both (i)
13
argument on the Parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and (ii) a case management
14
conference from December 16, 2011 until January 13, 2012. See Dkt. No. 421. January 13,
15
2012 is three days after the pretrial submissions listed above are due, and eleven days before the
16
Pretrial Conference is set to occur.
17
3.
In order to avoid having to prepare pretrial submissions that may be mooted in
18
whole or in part by this Court’s decisions on the Parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment,
19
the Parties request that the Pretrial Conference be rescheduled to no earlier than February 27,
20
2012 and the trial be rescheduled to begin no earlier than March 12, 2012, but preferably no
21
later than April 30, 2012.
22
For the foregoing reasons, the Parties respectfully request that the Court grant this
23
Stipulation, rescheduling the Pretrial Conference and the start of trial in the above captioned
24
litigation.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
AND SET A NEW DATE FOR TRIAL
PT1 551531v2 10/06/11
PT1 561204v2 12/15/11
CASE NO: CV-10-0325 SI
Case3:10-cv-00325-SI Document422
1
Filed12/16/11 Page3 of 3
Dated: December 16, 2011
s/ Jay D. Marinstein
Jay D. Marinstein (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Dated: December 16, 2011
s/ Peter M. Rehon
Peter M. Rehon
REHON & ROBERTS
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants TOYAMA
PARTNERS, LLC; PETER PAU d/b/a SAND HILL PROPERTY
COMPANY, a sole proprietorship; PETER PAU, in his individual
capacity and as partner of SAND HILL PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT COMPANY; SUSANNA PAU, in her capacity
as partner of SAND HILL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
COMPANY; SAND HILL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
COMPANY, and CAPELLA-MOWRY, LLC.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ORDER
14
15
16
17
18
The Court, having considered the foregoing, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby
ordered that:
1.
The pretrial conference, currently scheduled for January 24, 2012, is hereby
4/3/12
330
continued to ____________, ___, 2012, at ___ a.m./p.m.;
3/20
(Pretrial Submissions due __________, ____, 2012, pursuant to the Pretrial
19
Instructions at Dkt. No. 280-1)
20
21
22
2.
The trial, currently scheduled to begin February 6, 2012, is hereby continued to
4/16/12
8:30
____________, ___, 2012, at ___ a.m./p.m.
23
24
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
25
26
27
The Honorable Susan Illston
U.S. District Court Judge
Northern District of California
28
2
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
AND SET A NEW DATE FOR TRIAL
PT1 551531v2 10/06/11
PT1 561204v2 12/15/11
CASE NO: CV-10-0325 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?