Corral et al v. Air China Limited et al
Filing
16
ORDER (NINETY-DAY CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL); Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 11/12/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2010)
<![CDATA[
Corral et al v. Air China Limited et al
Doc. 16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 VELIA CORRAL et al, Plaintiff(s), v. AIR CHINA LTD et al, Defendant(s). / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. C 10-0356 MHP ORDER (Ninety-Day Conditional Dismissal)
The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this action. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
Dated: 11/12/2010
MARILYN HALL PATEL United States District Court Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
