Curtis v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 209

ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND TRIAL DATE 206 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/1/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 RONALD EL-MALIK CURTIS, Case No. 10-cv-00358-SI Plaintiff, 9 v. ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND TRIAL DATE 10 11 CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 206 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 14 On June 30, 2015, the City filed a motion to postpone trial in this case, currently set to 15 begin August 10, 2015, by seven months to March of 2016. In a sworn declaration, counsel for the 16 City explains that her husband has recently been diagnosed with a terminal illness, and as a result 17 she will need to alter her work-related obligations. The Court is saddened to learn of this 18 unfortunate news, and wishes Ms. Jordan-Davis and her family the best during this difficult time. 19 The actions giving rise to this lawsuit occurred in 2007, 2008 and 2009. The lawsuit was 20 filed in 2010. In his opposition to the motion to postpone, plaintiff argues that (1) the trial date 21 has already been postponed multiple times, most recently by five months to accommodate the 22 parties’ scheduling conflicts, (2) counsel for plaintiff will not be available to try any cases in 2016, 23 and (3) there are a number of other attorneys representing the City who have been working 24 alongside Ms. Jordan-Davis throughout this litigation who could take over for her. The Court is 25 persuaded by these arguments and therefore declines to extend the trial date to March of 2016. 26 In his opposition, plaintiff suggests moving the trial to November 2, 2015 to allow the City 27 additional time to coordinate change of counsel. In light of this suggestion, the Court will allow 28 defendants to determine whether they would prefer to move the trial to November 2, 2015, 1 or to proceed as currently scheduled on August 10, 2015. Defendants are ORDERED to file 2 a notice with the Court no later than July 10, 2015, stating which date they prefer. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 1, 2015 6 ________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?