Curtis v. City of Oakland et al
Filing
209
ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND TRIAL DATE 206 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/1/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
RONALD EL-MALIK CURTIS,
Case No. 10-cv-00358-SI
Plaintiff,
9
v.
ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION
TO EXTEND TRIAL DATE
10
11
CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 206
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
14
On June 30, 2015, the City filed a motion to postpone trial in this case, currently set to
15
begin August 10, 2015, by seven months to March of 2016. In a sworn declaration, counsel for the
16
City explains that her husband has recently been diagnosed with a terminal illness, and as a result
17
she will need to alter her work-related obligations. The Court is saddened to learn of this
18
unfortunate news, and wishes Ms. Jordan-Davis and her family the best during this difficult time.
19
The actions giving rise to this lawsuit occurred in 2007, 2008 and 2009. The lawsuit was
20
filed in 2010. In his opposition to the motion to postpone, plaintiff argues that (1) the trial date
21
has already been postponed multiple times, most recently by five months to accommodate the
22
parties’ scheduling conflicts, (2) counsel for plaintiff will not be available to try any cases in 2016,
23
and (3) there are a number of other attorneys representing the City who have been working
24
alongside Ms. Jordan-Davis throughout this litigation who could take over for her. The Court is
25
persuaded by these arguments and therefore declines to extend the trial date to March of 2016.
26
In his opposition, plaintiff suggests moving the trial to November 2, 2015 to allow the City
27
additional time to coordinate change of counsel. In light of this suggestion, the Court will allow
28
defendants to determine whether they would prefer to move the trial to November 2, 2015,
1
or to proceed as currently scheduled on August 10, 2015. Defendants are ORDERED to file
2
a notice with the Court no later than July 10, 2015, stating which date they prefer.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 1, 2015
6
________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?