Geist et al v. California Reconveyance Company et al

Filing 20

ORDER to continue CMC and Motion to Dismiss re 19 Proposed Order filed by John C. Geist, Becky Parker Geist. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/13/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ohn C. Geist Becky Parker Geist 724 Appleberry Drive San Rafael, California 94903 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] Plaintiffs in Pro Per JOHN M. SORICH (CA BAR NO. 125223) [e-mail] S. CHRISTOPHER YOO (CA BAR NO. 169442) [e-mail] ADORNO YOSS ALVARADO & SMITH A Professional Corporation 1 MacArthur Place, Suite 200 Santa Ana, California 92707 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA John C. Geist, pro se and Becky Parker Geist, pro se Plaintiff(s) v.

Case No. CV 10-0367 CRB JUDGE: Honorable Charles R. Breyer STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS FORMER: DATE: May 7, 2010 TIME: 10:00 AM CTRM: 8, 19th Floor NEW: DATE: TIME: CTRM: May 21, 2010 10:00 AM 8, 19th Floor

CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, d/b/a WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK and DOES 1 through 100, one up Defendants

Action Filed: January 26, 2010

The undersigned parties, through counsel, STIPULATE and AGREE and jointly request modification of this Court's Orders concerning and setting dates in the above matter. All parties make this request based on the following circumstances: 1
J STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING DATES; CASE NO. CV 10-0367 CRB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

1.

This case was initially set for Case Management Conference on May 5, 2010.

Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, which was set for hearing on April 14, 2010. Plaintiffs filed an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. The motion hearing date was moved to May 7, 2010. 2. The court, by reason of a judicial re-assignment, re-scheduled the Case Management

Conference to May 7, 2010. 3. Plaintiffs John C. Geist and Becky Parker Geist are representing themselves in this

matter. Plaintiff Becky Parker Geist has a prior work commitment on May 7, 2010, a technical rehearsal for which she is the Director at Solano Community College that conflicts with the currentlyset hearing dates. The May 7th date was selected by defense court without consulting the Geists in advance. 4. Under the circumstances, counsel John M. Sorich and S. Christopher Yoo, who

represent all the defendants have stipulated to a brief continuance of the May 7, 2010 dates for Case Management Conference and for hearing on the Motion to Dismiss. For the aforementioned reasons, the parties jointly request the hearing dates presently set for May 7, 2010, be extended to May 21, 2010, or beyond, if more convenient for the Court. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: April 6, 2010 By: /s/ John C. Geist

Dated: April 6, 2010 By: /s/ Becky Parker Geist Dated: April 9, 2010

/s/ S. CHRISTOPHER YOO ADORNO YOSS ALVARADO & SMITH

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING DATES; CASE NO. CV 10-0367 CRB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ORDER Based on the above stipulation, and for good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that in the above cases, the hearing dates for the case management conference and the hearing on the motion to dismiss be re-scheduled. The Court shall send notice of the new date assigned.

UNIT ED

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated:

HON. CHARLES R. BREYER

S

April 13, 2010

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING DATES; CASE NO. CV 10-0367 CRB

A

C

LI

FO

har Judge C

reyer les R. B

R NIA

O OR IT IS S

DERED

RT U O

NO

RT

H