Wade v. Gilliland et al

Filing 130

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE ACTION AGAINST DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/6/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 E. K. WADE, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, No. C 10-00425 WHA v. WOODY GILLILAND, in his individual capacity, WILLIAM SMITHERMAN, in his individual capacity, GEORGIA MARTIN, in her individual capacity, ALICE YOUNG, in her individual capacity, SARAH NELSON, in her individual capacity, KATHY ANN BATISTE, in her individual capacity, and BERLENE ROBERTS, in her individual capacity, ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE ACTION AGAINST DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Defendants. / 18 19 Plaintiff E.K. Wade has filed fifteen actions against the United States Department of 20 Labor and its employees. Judge Charles Breyer has already declared Wade a vexatious litigant, 21 and the undersigned judge ordered Wade to seek leave to file further complaints against the 22 Department of Labor, inter alia. The Court received a letter from Wade in which he stated “I 23 must file a complaint against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Department 24 of Labor” and that he “simply forgot” about the pre-filing review order. Wade failed to append 25 any proposed complaint or explain the details of his lawsuit, but merely asserted “[t]his is not a 26 frivolous lawsuit.” Based on Wade’s submissions, this order DENIES his request to file the 27 proposed lawsuit. 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 6, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?