Wade v. Gilliland et al
Filing
130
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE ACTION AGAINST DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/6/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
E. K. WADE,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
No. C 10-00425 WHA
v.
WOODY GILLILAND, in his individual capacity,
WILLIAM SMITHERMAN, in his individual
capacity, GEORGIA MARTIN, in her individual
capacity, ALICE YOUNG, in her individual
capacity, SARAH NELSON, in her individual
capacity, KATHY ANN BATISTE, in her
individual capacity, and BERLENE ROBERTS,
in her individual capacity,
ORDER DENYING LEAVE
TO FILE ACTION AGAINST
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Defendants.
/
18
19
Plaintiff E.K. Wade has filed fifteen actions against the United States Department of
20
Labor and its employees. Judge Charles Breyer has already declared Wade a vexatious litigant,
21
and the undersigned judge ordered Wade to seek leave to file further complaints against the
22
Department of Labor, inter alia. The Court received a letter from Wade in which he stated “I
23
must file a complaint against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Department
24
of Labor” and that he “simply forgot” about the pre-filing review order. Wade failed to append
25
any proposed complaint or explain the details of his lawsuit, but merely asserted “[t]his is not a
26
frivolous lawsuit.” Based on Wade’s submissions, this order DENIES his request to file the
27
proposed lawsuit.
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 6, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?