Wade v. Gilliland et al

Filing 34

ORDER by Judge Laporte granting 19 Motion to Amend/Correct (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and a First Amended Complaint on April 12, 2010. Plaintiff's motion argues that good cause exists for allowing the amendment, and judicial economy will be served, because the proposed First Amended Complaint narrows the issues before the Court. Plaintiff did not notice the Motion to Amend for hearing, and Defendants have filed a statement of non-opposition. The Court finds the Motion to Amend appropriate for resolution without oral argument and finds good cause for allowing the amendment. The First Amended Complaint that was filed on April 12, 2010 without leave of Court is now allowed and shall now serve as the operative pleading in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 27, 2010 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge v. WOODY GILLIAND, et al., Defendants. E.K. WADE, Plaintiff, No. C-10-0425 EDL ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA