Arden v. Kastell et al

Filing 153

PROPOSED VERDICT FORM. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 10/19/2014. (nclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 GARY ARDEN, 13 14 Case No. 3:10-cv-00436 NC Plaintiff, PROPOSED VERDICT FORM v. 15 FRANK KASTELL, 16 Defendant. 17 18 We, the jury, unanimously find the following by a preponderance of the evidence: 19 (1) Did Frank Kastell act under color of state law? 20 Answer: Yes _____ No _____ 21 If you answered “Yes” to Question (1), proceed to Question (2). If you answered 22 “No,” to Question (1), please skip to bottom, sign and return. 23 (2) Did Frank Kastell deliberately make a false statement in a police report 24 in violation of Gary Arden’s Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of 25 law? 26 Answer: Yes _____ No _____ 27 If you answered “Yes” to Question (2), proceed to Question (3). If you answered 28 “No,” to Question (2), please skip to bottom, sign and return. Case No. 3:10-cv-00436 NC VERDICT FORM 1 (3) Did Frank Kastell’s act, described in Part (2) above, cause injury to Gary 2 Arden? 3 Answer: Yes _____ No _____ 4 If you answered “Yes” to Question (3), proceed to Question (4). If you answered 5 “No,” to Question (3), please skip to bottom, sign and return. 6 (4) State the amount that will fairly compensate Gary Arden for all the 7 injury and damage he actually sustained as a result of Frank Kastell’s 8 conduct. If no damages are attributable to Frank Kastell, enter zero. If 9 nominal damages are attributable to Frank Kastell, enter $1. 10 Answer: $ __________ 11 (Fill in Dollar Figure) 12 SO SAY WE ALL, this ___ day of October, 2014. 13 14 Presiding Juror ____________ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:10-cv-00436 NC VERDICT FORM 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?