Arden v. Kastell et al

Filing 76

ORDER re 75 Notice of Untimely Filing. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on November 2, 2011. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Case No. 10-cv-00436 NC GARY ARDEN, ORDER RE: NOTICE OF UNTIMELY FILING v. FRANK KASTELL, LINARD DAVIS, AIRPORT TRAVEL AGENCY, INC., ALLA SERDYUCHENKO, RON BRIGHAM, SMARTE CARTE, Inc., and Does 1-10, Re: Docket No. 75 Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff Gary Arden has filed a Notice of Untimely Filing of the Declaration of 20 Charles Carreon in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 21 75). The Court finds that the reasons for the filing delay – length of exhibits and an 22 unknown technical error – are sufficient under Civil General Order 45 to consider timely 23 documents filed the next business day, November 1, 2011. See Gen. Order 45(VI)(e). 24 The Court also finds that the late filing, which was completed 12 minutes after the filing 25 deadline, has caused no prejudice. 26 27 For good cause showing, the Court will take into consideration the Declaration of Charles Carreon and attached Exhibits in support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s 28 Case No. 10-cv-00436 NC ORDER RE: NOTICE OF UNTIMELY FILING 1 Motion for Summary Judgment. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 DATED: November 2, 2011 ___________________________ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 10-cv-00436 NC ORDER RE: NOTICE OF UNTIMELY FILING 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?