Arden v. Kastell et al
Filing
76
ORDER re 75 Notice of Untimely Filing. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on November 2, 2011. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
9
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Case No. 10-cv-00436 NC
GARY ARDEN,
ORDER RE: NOTICE OF
UNTIMELY FILING
v.
FRANK KASTELL, LINARD DAVIS,
AIRPORT TRAVEL AGENCY, INC., ALLA
SERDYUCHENKO, RON BRIGHAM,
SMARTE CARTE, Inc., and Does 1-10,
Re: Docket No. 75
Defendants.
17
18
19
Plaintiff Gary Arden has filed a Notice of Untimely Filing of the Declaration of
20
Charles Carreon in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No.
21
75). The Court finds that the reasons for the filing delay – length of exhibits and an
22
unknown technical error – are sufficient under Civil General Order 45 to consider timely
23
documents filed the next business day, November 1, 2011. See Gen. Order 45(VI)(e).
24
The Court also finds that the late filing, which was completed 12 minutes after the filing
25
deadline, has caused no prejudice.
26
27
For good cause showing, the Court will take into consideration the Declaration of
Charles Carreon and attached Exhibits in support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s
28
Case No. 10-cv-00436 NC
ORDER RE: NOTICE OF
UNTIMELY FILING
1
Motion for Summary Judgment.
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
7
DATED: November 2, 2011
___________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 10-cv-00436 NC
ORDER RE: NOTICE OF
UNTIMELY FILING
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?