Arden v. Kastell et al

Filing 9

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 6 Proposed Order filed by Gary Arden. Signed by Judge James Larson on 4/20/10. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2010)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-00436-JL Document6 Filed04/16/10 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GARY ARDEN, Plaintiff, vs. FRANK KASTELL, LINARD DAVIS, AIRPORT TRAVEL AGENCY, INC., ALLA SERDYUCHENKO, RON BRIGHAM, SMARTE CARTE, INC., and Does 1 - 10 Defendants. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and their counsel, the Case Management Deadlines for this case are continued as set forth below: Case Management Event Meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan File ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel File either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference File Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement per Standing Order re Contents of Joint Case Management Statement Initial Case Management Conference in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco Current Date 4/21/2010 4/21/2010 4/21/2010 New Date 5/28/2010 5/28/2010 5/28/2010 Case No.: 3:10-CV-00436 JL [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES 5/5/2010 6/16/2010 10:30 A.M. 5/12/2010 10:30 A.M. 6/23/2010 PAGE 1 OF ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES Case3:10-cv-00436-JL Document6 Filed04/16/10 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: April _____, 2010 James Larson, U.S. Magistrate Judge Submitted by: CHARLES CARREON, ESQ. 2165 S. Avenida Planeta Tucson, Arizona 85710 Tel: 520-841-0835 Email: chas@charlescarreon.com Attorney for Plaintiff Gary Arden PAGE 2 OF ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?