TV Interactive Data Corporation v. Sony Corporation et al
Filing
761
Court's Proposed Verdict Form. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT
5
NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA
6
7
TV INTERAC
V
CTIVE DAT
TA
CORPORATI
ION,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 1
10-cv-00475
5-JCS
v.
ONY CORP
PORATION, et al.,
,
SO
Defendants
s.
12
13
14
COURT’S PROPOSED VERDIC FORM
C
P
D
CT
15
16
17
18
19
Da
ated: March 21, 2013
2
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
__
___________
__________
____
Jos
seph C. Sper
ro
Un
nited States M
Magistrate J
Judge
1
2
We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them
under the instructions of this Court as our verdict in this case
3
INFRINGEMENT
4
5
1.
Has TVI proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Sony directly infringes any of
the following claims of the TVI Patents?
6
7
Please answer in each space with a “Y” for “Yes” (for TVI) or with an “N” for “No” (for Sony) as
to each claim for each product.
8
Sony BDP-S550
Blu-ray Player
(Representative of
DVD/Blu-ray Players)
9
10
PlayStation 3
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
’307 Claim 1
______
______
12
’307 Claim 2
______
______
13
’307 Claim 3
______
______
14
’307 Claim 4
______
______
15
’307 Claim 5
______
______
16
’307 Claim 7
______
______
17
’307 Claim 9
______
______
18
’307 Claim 18
______
______
’156 Claim 1
______
______
’156 Claim 2
______
______
22
’863 Claim 1
______
______
23
’863 Claim 9
______
______
’532 Claim 1
______
______
’532 Claim 9
______
______
’532 Claim 17
______
______
19
20
21
24
25
26
27
28
Please go on to Question No. 2.
2
1
2.
Has TVI proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Sony induced infringement of
any of the following claims of the TVI Patents?
2
3
Please answer in each space with a “Y” for “Yes” (for TVI) or with an “N” for “No” (for Sony) as
to each claim for each product.
4
Sony BDP-S550
Blu-ray Player
(Representative of
DVD/Blu-ray Players)
5
6
PlayStation 3
’307 Claim 1
______
______
8
’307 Claim 2
______
______
9
’307 Claim 3
______
______
10
’307 Claim 4
______
______
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
7
’307 Claim 5
______
______
12
’307 Claim 7
______
______
13
’307 Claim 9
______
______
14
’307 Claim 18
______
______
’532 Claim 1
______
______
’532 Claim 9
______
______
’532 Claim 17
______
______
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Please go on to Question No. 3.
28
3
1
3.
Has TVI proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Sony has contributed to the
infringement of any of the following claims of the TVI Patents?
2
3
Please answer in each space with a “Y” for “Yes” (for TVI) or with an “N” for “No” (for Sony) as
to each claim for each product.
4
Sony BDP-S550
Blu-ray Player
(Representative of
DVD/Blu-ray Players)
5
6
PlayStation 3
’307 Claim 1
______
______
8
’307 Claim 2
______
______
9
’307 Claim 3
______
______
10
’307 Claim 4
______
______
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
7
’307 Claim 5
______
______
12
’307 Claim 7
______
______
13
’307 Claim 9
______
______
14
’307 Claim 18
______
______
17
’532 Claim 1
______
______
18
’532 Claim 9
______
______
19
’532 Claim 17
______
______
15
16
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Please go on to Question No. 4.
28
4
1
2
3
4.
If you answered “Yes” to any of Questions 1 through 3, and thus found that Sony has
infringed any of the claims of the TVI Patents, has TVI proved by clear and convincing
evidence that Sony’s infringement was willful?
Please put an “X” in the appropriate space indicating either “Yes” (for TVI) or “No” (for Sony).
4
5
6
7
Sony BDP-S550
Blu-ray Player
(Representative of
DVD/Blu-ray Players)
PlayStation 3
Yes ______
Yes ______
8
9
10
No ______
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Please go on to Question No. 5.
28
5
No ______
VALIDITY
1
2
3
4
5
6
5.
Anticipation: Has Sony proved by clear and convincing evidence that any of the
following claims of the TVI Patents are invalid as anticipated by any of the references
identified by Sony? You must consider each reference separately as to each claim.
Please put an “X” in the appropriate space indicating either “Yes” (for Sony) or “No” (for TVI).
Please mark only one space for each of the listed claims of the TVI Patents.
7
’307 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
9
’307 Claim 2 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
10
’307 Claim 3 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
8
’307 Claim 4 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
12
’307 Claim 5 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
13
’307 Claim 7 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
14
’307 Claim 9 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
15
’307 Claim 18 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
17
’156 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
18
’156 Claim 2 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI
20
’863 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
21
’863 Claim 9 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
23
’532 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
24
’532 Claim 9 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
25
’532 Claim 17 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
16
19
22
26
27
Please go on to Question No. 6.
28
6
1
2
6.
Obviousness: Has Sony proved by clear and convincing evidence that any of the
following claims of the TVI Patents are invalid because they would have been obvious
to a person of ordinary skill in the art in light of the combinations of references
identified by Sony?
3
4
Please put an “X” in the appropriate space indicating either “Yes” (for Sony) or “No” (for TVI).
Please mark only one space for each of the listed claims of the TVI Patents.
5
6
’307 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
’307 Claim 2 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
’307 Claim 3 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
’307 Claim 4 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
’307 Claim 5 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
’307 Claim 7 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
’307 Claim 9 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
’307 Claim 18 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
16
’156 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
17
’156 Claim 2 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
’863 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
’863 Claim 9 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
23
’532 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
24
’532 Claim 9 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
25
’532 Claim 17 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
18
19
20
21
22
26
27
Please go on to Question No. 7.
28
7
1
2
3
4
7.
Written Description: Has Sony proved by clear and convincing evidence that any of the
following claims of the TVI Patents are invalid for lack of a written description from
the perspective of a person of ordinary skill in the art?
Please put an “X” in the appropriate space indicating either “Yes” (for Sony) or “No” (for TVI).
Please mark only one space for each of the listed claims of the TVI Patents.
5
’307 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
7
’307 Claim 2 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
8
’307 Claim 3 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
9
’307 Claim 4 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
10
’307 Claim 5 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
6
’307 Claim 7 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
12
’307 Claim 9 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
13
’307 Claim 18 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
15
’156 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
16
’156 Claim 2 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
19
’863 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
20
’863 Claim 9 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
22
’532 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
23
’532 Claim 9 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
24
’532 Claim 17 Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
14
17
18
21
25
26
27
Please go on to Question No. 8.
28
8
1
2
8.
Inventorship: Has Sony proved by clear and convincing evidence that the inventorship
of any of the TVI Patents is incorrect?
3
4
Please put an “X” in the appropriate space indicating either “Yes” (for Sony) or “No” (for TVI).
Please mark only one space for each of the listed claims of the TVI Patents.
5
6
’307 Patent
Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
7
’156 Patent
Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
8
’863 Patent
Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
9
’532 Patent
Yes ______ (for Sony)
No ______
(for TVI)
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Please go on to Question No. 9.
28
9
DAMAGES
1
2
3
9.
4
5
If you found any claim infringed under Questions 1, 2 or 3, and valid under Questions
5, 6 and 7, what per unit running royalty rate do you find is adequate to compensate
TVI for the conduct you found to infringe? (Then multiply the number of infringing
units by the per-unit royalty to arrive at the total damages for each product.) If you did
not find any claim to be both infringed under Questions 1, 2 or 3, and valid under
Questions 5, 6 or 7, do not answer this question.
6
7
[Placeholder]1
8
number of DVD player units sold
x
$____________________
per-unit royalty
=
9
$____________________
TOTAL
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
[Placeholder]
12
number of Blu-ray player units sold
x
$___________________
per-unit royalty
=
13
$___________________
TOTAL
14
15
[Placeholder]
16
number of Playstation3 player units sold
x
$___________________
per-unit royalty
=
17
$___________________
TOTAL
18
19
20
Total Damages (DVD, Blu-ray, and Playstation3 totals combined):
21
$___________________________
22
23
24
25
DATE ___________________
INITIALS OF FOREPERSON ___________
26
27
28
1
The parties have stipulated to unit sales, which the parties agree will be included in the
final verdict form. Sony requested that TVI omit the actual numbers in this filing because it
currently intends to request the Court seal this information.
10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?