TV Interactive Data Corporation v. Sony Corporation et al

Filing 775

Final Verdict Form. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on March 25, 2013. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES D D DISTRICT C COURT 5 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI RN CT IFORNIA 6 7 TV INTERAC V CTIVE DAT TA CORPORATI ION, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 1 10-cv-00475 5-JCS v. ONY CORP PORATION, et al., , SO Defendants s. 12 13 14 FIN NAL VERD DICT FORM M 15 16 17 18 19 Da ated: March 25, 2013 2 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 __ ___________ __________ ____ Jos seph C. Sper ro Un nited States M Magistrate J Judge 1 2 We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them under the instructions of this Court as our verdict in this case 3 INFRINGEMENT 4 5 1. Has TVI proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Sony directly infringes any of the following claims of the TVI Patents? 6 7 Please answer in each space with a “Y” for “Yes” (for TVI) or with an “N” for “No” (for Sony) as to each claim for each product. 8 Sony BDP-S550 Blu-ray Player (Representative of DVD/Blu-ray Players) 9 10 PlayStation 3 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 ’307 Claim 1 ______ ______ 12 ’307 Claim 2 ______ ______ 13 ’307 Claim 18 ______ ______ ’156 Claim 1 ______ ______ 17 ’863 Claim 1 ______ ______ 18 ’863 Claim 9 ______ ______ 20 ’532 Claim 1 ______ ______ 21 ’532 Claim 9 ______ ______ 22 ’532 Claim 17 ______ ______ 14 15 16 19 23 24 25 26 27 Please go on to Question No. 2. 28 2 1 2. Has TVI proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Sony induced infringement of any of the following claims of the TVI Patents? 2 3 Please answer in each space with a “Y” for “Yes” (for TVI) or with an “N” for “No” (for Sony) as to each claim for each product. 4 Sony BDP-S550 Blu-ray Player (Representative of DVD/Blu-ray Players) 5 6 PlayStation 3 7 ’307 Claim 1 ______ ______ 8 ’307 Claim 2 ______ ______ 9 ’307 Claim 18 ______ ______ ’532 Claim 1 ______ ______ ’532 Claim 9 ______ ______ ’532 Claim 17 ______ ______ 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Please go on to Question No. 3. 28 3 1 3. Has TVI proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Sony has contributed to the infringement of any of the following claims of the TVI Patents? 2 3 Please answer in each space with a “Y” for “Yes” (for TVI) or with an “N” for “No” (for Sony) as to each claim for each product. 4 Sony BDP-S550 Blu-ray Player (Representative of DVD/Blu-ray Players) 5 6 PlayStation 3 7 ’307 Claim 1 ______ ______ 8 ’307 Claim 2 ______ ______ 9 ’307 Claim 18 ______ ______ 12 ’532 Claim 1 ______ ______ 13 ’532 Claim 9 ______ ______ 14 ’532 Claim 17 ______ ______ 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Please go on to Question No. 4. 28 4 1 2 3 4. If you answered “Yes” to any of Questions 1 through 3, and thus found that Sony has infringed any of the claims of the TVI Patents, has TVI proved by clear and convincing evidence that Sony’s infringement was willful? Please put an “X” in the appropriate space indicating either “Yes” (for TVI) or “No” (for Sony). 4 5 6 7 Sony BDP-S550 Blu-ray Player (Representative of DVD/Blu-ray Players) PlayStation 3 Yes ______ Yes ______ 8 9 10 No ______ United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Please go on to Question No. 5. 28 5 No ______ VALIDITY 1 2 3 4 5 6 5. Anticipation: Has Sony proved by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following claims of the TVI Patents are invalid as anticipated by any of the references identified by Sony? You must consider each reference separately as to each claim. Please put an “X” in the appropriate space indicating either “Yes” (for Sony) or “No” (for TVI). Please mark only one space for each of the listed claims of the TVI Patents. 7 8 ’307 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) 9 ’307 Claim 2 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) 10 ’307 Claim 18 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) ’156 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) 14 ’863 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) 15 ’863 Claim 9 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) 17 ’532 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) 18 ’532 Claim 9 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) 19 ’532 Claim 17 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Please go on to Question No. 6. 28 6 1 2 6. Obviousness: Has Sony proved by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following claims of the TVI Patents are invalid because they would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art in light of the combinations of references identified by Sony? 3 4 Please put an “X” in the appropriate space indicating either “Yes” (for Sony) or “No” (for TVI). Please mark only one space for each of the listed claims of the TVI Patents. 5 6 ’307 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) ’307 Claim 2 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) ’307 Claim 18 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) ’156 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) 13 ’863 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) 14 ’863 Claim 9 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) ’532 Claim 1 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) ’532 Claim 9 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) ’532 Claim 17 Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Please go on to Question No. 7. 28 7 1 7. Inventorship: Has Sony proved by clear and convincing evidence that the inventorship of any of the TVI Patents is incorrect? 2 3 Please put an “X” in the appropriate space indicating either “Yes” (for Sony) or “No” (for TVI). Please mark only one space for each of the listed claims of the TVI Patents. 4 5 ’307 Patent Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) 6 ’156 Patent Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) 7 ’863 Patent Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) 8 ’532 Patent Yes ______ (for Sony) No ______ (for TVI) 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Please go on to Question No. 8. 28 8 DAMAGES 1 2 3 8. 4 5 If you found any claim infringed under Questions 1, 2 or 3, and valid under Questions 5 and 6, what per unit running royalty rate do you find is adequate to compensate TVI for the conduct you found to infringe? (Then multiply the number of infringing units by the per-unit royalty to arrive at the total damages for each product.) If you did not find any claim to be both infringed under Questions 1, 2 or 3, and valid under Questions 5 and 6, do not answer this question. 6 7 [Placeholder]1 8 number of DVD player units sold x $____________________ per-unit royalty = 9 $____________________ TOTAL 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 [Placeholder] 12 number of Blu-ray player units sold x $___________________ per-unit royalty = 13 $___________________ TOTAL 14 15 [Placeholder] 16 number of Playstation3 player units sold x $___________________ per-unit royalty = 17 $___________________ TOTAL 18 19 20 Total Damages (DVD, Blu-ray, and Playstation3 totals combined): 21 $___________________________ 22 23 24 25 DATE ___________________ INITIALS OF FOREPERSON ___________ 26 27 28 1 The parties have stipulated to unit sales, which the parties agree will be included in the final verdict form. Sony requested that TVI omit the actual numbers in this filing because it currently intends to request the Court seal this information. 9

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?