Dimery v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 65

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIERATION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED AS UNOPPOSED; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE; AND CONTINUING HEARING: Responses due by 9/24/2012. Replies due by 10/1/2012. Motion Hearing set for 11/2/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/19/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

ISELA DIMERY,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

No. C 10-00481 JSW

Plaintiff,
v.
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY, et al.,

13
Defendants.

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER
TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION SHOULD
NOT BE GRANTED AS
UNOPPOSED; SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE; AND
CONTINUING HEARING

14
/
15
16

The Court has received and considered Defendants’ response to this Court’s Order to

17

Show Cause why Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration should not be granted as unopposed.

18

The Court finds good cause to discharge the Order to Show Cause without imposing any form

19

of sanctions. Both parties are admonished to include the factual bases underlying a request to

20

continue deadlines or hearings scheduled before this Court and to carefully read this Court’s

21

Order.

22

The Court shall continue the hearing on the motion for reconsideration to Friday,

23

November 2, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. Defendants shall file the opposition to the motion for

24

reconsideration and their motion to dismiss without prejudice by September 24, 2012.

25

Plaintiff shall file her reply to the motion for reconsideration on October 1, 2012, and

26

shall file her opposition to the motion to dismiss by October 9, 2012. Defendants shall file their

27

reply to the motion to dismiss by October 16, 2012.

28

1
2
3
4

If the Court finds the motions suitable for disposition without oral argument, it shall
notify the parties in advance of the hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 19, 2012
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2