Roling v. E*Trade Securities LLC

Filing 150

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 148 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Briefs on Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment filed by E*Trade Securities LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/25/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

COOLEY LLP
MARTIN S. SCHENKER (109828)
WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463)
101 California Street, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-5800
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
COOLEY LLP
DOUGLAS P. LOBEL (pro hac vice)
11951 Freedom Drive, Suite 1600
Reston, Virginia 20190
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
E*TRADE SECURITIES LLC

11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
17
18
19

JOSEPH ROLING and ALEXANDER
Case No. CV 10-488 EMC
LANDVATER, individuals and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING OVERLENGTH BRIEF ON
Plaintiffs,
RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
v.

20
21

E*TRADE SECURITIES LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company, and
Does 1-50, inclusive,

22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

505500•RE

STIPULATION RE OVERLENGTH BRIEFS
CV 10-488 EMC

1
2
3

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs Joseph Roling and Alexander
Landvater (“Plaintiffs”) and E*TRADE Securities LLC (“E*TRADE”), that:
1.

E*TRADE may file an overlength brief, not to exceed 30 pages, in support of its

4

Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, which E*TRADE intends to file on February 3, 2012

5

(the “Motion”); and

6

2.

Plaintiffs may file an overlength brief, not to exceed 30 pages, in opposition to

7

the Renewed Motion within 14 days of filing and service of E*TRADE’s brief as permitted by

8

the Local Rules of this Court. If Plaintiffs file an amended complaint on or before January 27,

9

2011, E*TRADE will then immediately withdraw its currently-pending Motion for Summary

10

Judgment, and thus Plaintiffs’ present deadline of January 31, 2012 for filing an Opposition to

11

the currently-pending motion (along with the Hearing scheduled for February 24, 2012) will be

12

removed from the calendar.

13
14

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: January 25, 2012

EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP

15
16
By: /s/ Steven L. Woodrow
Steven L. Woodrow (pro hac vice)

17
18
19

Counsel for Plaintiffs
Dated: January 25, 2012

COOLEY LLP

20
21
By: /s/ Douglas P. Lobel
Douglas P. Lobel (pro hac vice)

22
23

Attorneys for Defendant
E*TRADE SECURITIES LLC

S

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

505500•RE

-1-

RT

SAN FRANCISCO

NO

COOLEY LLP

n
M. Che
Edward OVERLENGTH BRIEFS
STIPULATION RE
Judge

FO

28

CV 10-488 EMC

H

ER

LI

27

_________________________________
RED
The Honorable Edward M.RDE
SO O Chen
IS
United StatesIT
District Court Judge

A

1/25/12
Dated: ________________________

UNIT
ED

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT
U
O

25

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R NIA

24

N

F

C