Roling v. E*Trade Securities LLC

Filing 179

ORDER re 178 Order Denying on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/21/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-00488-EMC Document178 Filed02/21/12 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Sean P. Reis (SBN 184044) ( EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 Tel: 949.459.2124 Fax: 949.459.2123 Rafey S. Balabanian (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ( Steven L. Woodrow (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ( Ari J. Scharg (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ( EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC 350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300 Chicago, Illinois 60654 Tel: 312.589.6370 Fax: 312.589.6378 Counsel for Plaintiffs and the putative classes IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 JOSEPH ROLING and ALEXANDER LANDVATER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 E*TRADE SECURITIES LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 18 19 Case No.: 3:10-cv-00488-EMC [Honorable Edward M. Chen] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 7-11 AND 79-5 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Document Under Seal Case No. 3:10-cv-00488-EMC Case3:10-cv-00488-EMC Document178 Filed02/21/12 Page2 of 2 1 The Court has considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Document Under Seal 2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5 and the accompanying Declaration of Ari J. Scharg. 3 1. Good cause having been shown, those identified redacted portions of Plaintiffs’ 4 Second Amended Complaint shall remain sealed, subject to E*TRADE’s compliance with Local 5 Rule 79-5(d). 6 Accordingly, the Court hereby Orders that, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(d), within 7 days, 7 E*TRADE shall file with the Court and serve a declaration establishing that the document set 8 forth above is partially sealable, and shall lodge and serve a narrowly tailored proposed sealing 9 order, or must withdraw the designation of confidentiality. If E*TRADE does not file its 10 declaration as required by Local Rule 79-5(d), the document set forth above shall be filed and 11 made part of the public record. 12 20 ER R NIA FO LI dwa Judge E H 19 RT 18 hen rd M. C NO 17 E O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO A 16 U.S. District Court Judge Northern District of CaliforniaD RE UNIT ED 15 S DISTRICT TE C TA Hon. Edward M. Chen RT U O 14 2/21/12 S 13 Dated: E*Trade has informed the Court that the document at issue need not be filed under seal. Accordingly, Plaintiffs are ordered to publicly file the document upon receipt of this order. N F D IS T IC T O R C 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Document Under Seal Case No. 3:10-cv-00488-EMC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?