Roling v. E*Trade Securities LLC

Filing 179

ORDER re 178 Order Denying on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/21/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2012)

Case3:10-cv-00488-EMC Document178 Filed02/21/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Sean P. Reis (SBN 184044)
([e-mail])
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP
30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Rafey S. Balabanian (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
([e-mail])
Steven L. Woodrow (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
([e-mail])
Ari J. Scharg (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
([e-mail])
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC
350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiffs and the putative classes
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14

JOSEPH ROLING and ALEXANDER
LANDVATER, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,

15

Plaintiffs,

16

v.

17

E*TRADE SECURITIES LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, and DOES 1-50,
inclusive,

18
19

Case No.: 3:10-cv-00488-EMC
[Honorable Edward M. Chen]
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DENYING
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER
SEAL PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 7-11
AND 79-5

Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Document Under Seal
Case No. 3:10-cv-00488-EMC

Case3:10-cv-00488-EMC Document178 Filed02/21/12 Page2 of 2

1

The Court has considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Document Under Seal

2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5 and the accompanying Declaration of Ari J. Scharg.
3

1.

Good cause having been shown, those identified redacted portions of Plaintiffs’

4 Second Amended Complaint shall remain sealed, subject to E*TRADE’s compliance with Local
5 Rule 79-5(d).
6

Accordingly, the Court hereby Orders that, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(d), within 7 days,

7 E*TRADE shall file with the Court and serve a declaration establishing that the document set
8 forth above is partially sealable, and shall lodge and serve a narrowly tailored proposed sealing
9 order, or must withdraw the designation of confidentiality. If E*TRADE does not file its
10 declaration as required by Local Rule 79-5(d), the document set forth above shall be filed and
11 made part of the public record.
12

20

ER

R NIA
FO

LI

dwa
Judge E

H

19

RT

18

hen

rd M. C

NO

17

E
O ORD D
IT IS S
DIFIE
AS MO

A

16

U.S. District Court Judge
Northern District of CaliforniaD
RE

UNIT
ED

15

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
Hon. Edward M. Chen

RT
U
O

14

2/21/12

S

13 Dated:

E*Trade has informed the Court that the document at issue need not be
filed under seal. Accordingly, Plaintiffs are ordered to publicly file the
document upon receipt of this order.

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Document Under Seal
Case No. 3:10-cv-00488-EMC

2