Roling v. E*Trade Securities LLC

Filing 180

AMENDED ORDER DENYING re 178 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/21/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Sean P. Reis (SBN 184044)
([e-mail])
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP
30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Rafey S. Balabanian (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
([e-mail])
Steven L. Woodrow (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
([e-mail])
Ari J. Scharg (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
([e-mail])
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC
350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiffs and the putative classes
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14

JOSEPH ROLING and ALEXANDER
LANDVATER, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,

15

Plaintiffs,

16

v.

17

E*TRADE SECURITIES LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, and DOES 1-50,
inclusive,

18
19

Case No.: 3:10-cv-00488-EMC
[Honorable Edward M. Chen]
AMENDED
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DENYING
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER
SEAL PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 7-11
AND 79-5

Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Document Under Seal
Case No. 3:10-cv-00488-EMC

1

The Court has considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Document Under Seal

2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5 and the accompanying Declaration of Ari J. Scharg.
3

1.

Good cause having been shown, those identified redacted portions of Plaintiffs’

4 Second Amended Complaint shall remain sealed, subject to E*TRADE’s compliance with Local
5 Rule 79-5(d).
6

Accordingly, the Court hereby Orders that, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(d), within 7 days,

7 E*TRADE shall file with the Court and serve a declaration establishing that the document set
8 forth above is partially sealable, and shall lodge and serve a narrowly tailored proposed sealing
9 order, or must withdraw the designation of confidentiality. If E*TRADE does not file its
10 declaration as required by Local Rule 79-5(d), the document set forth above shall be filed and

20

ER

LI

dwa
Judge E

H

19

RT

18

hen

rd M. C

NO

17

D

DENIE

A

16

UNIT
ED

15

U.S. District Court Judge
Northern District of California

RT
U
O

14

2/21/12

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
Hon. Edward M. Chen

S

13 Dated:

R NIA

12

E*Trade has informed the Court that the document at issue need not be
filed under seal. Accordingly, Plaintiffs are ordered to publicly file the
document upon receipt of this order.

FO

11 made part of the public record.

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Document Under Seal
Case No. 3:10-cv-00488-EMC

2