Dudum et al v. Arntz et al

Filing 49

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT. Case Management Statement due by 4/26/2010. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/31/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NIELSEN, MERKSAMER, PARRINELLO, MUELLER & NAYLOR, LLP JAMES R. PARRINELLO, ESQ. (S.B. NO. 63415) CHRISTOPHER E. SKINNELL, ESQ. (S.B. NO. 227093) 2350 Kerner Boulevard, Suite 250 San Rafael, California 94901 Telephone: (415) 389-6800 Facsimile: (415) 388-6874 Email: jparrinello@nmgovlaw.com Email: cskinnell@nmgovlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs RON DUDUM, MATTHEW SHERIDAN, ELIZABETH MURPHY, KATHERINE WEBSTER, MARINA FRANCO and DENNIS FLYNN *E-Filed 3/31/10* IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RON DUDUM, MATTHEW SHERIDAN, ELIZABETH MURPHY, KATHERINE WEBSTER, MARINA FRANCO and DENNIS FLYNN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) JOHN ARNTZ, Director of Elections of the ) ) City and County of San Francisco; the ) CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a ) ) municipal corporation; the SAN ) FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF ) ELECTIONS; the SAN FRANCISCO ) ELECTIONS COMMISSION; and DOES 1- ) ) 20, ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) Case No. C 10-00504 RS STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES EXTENDING TIME TO FILE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT TO APRIL 26, 2010 JUDGE: Hon. Richard Seeborg COURTROOM: 3 __________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES EXTENDING TIME TO FILE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NO. C 10-00504 RS Page i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME WHEREAS, pursuant to court order an initial case management statement is currently scheduled to be submitted by the parties in this case on April 2, 2010; and WHEREAS, a hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction is currently pending, with a hearing date set for April 1, 2010, at 1:30 p.m.--the day before the case management statement is due; and WHEREAS, the parties request that the initial due date of the initial CMC statement be postponed until after the hearing on the preliminary injunction motion, and believe that the initial CMC statement will be better focused, and more informative to the Court if filed at a later date that will permit consideration of the Court's comments at the hearing; and WHEREAS, no previous extension of the time to file an initial case management statement has been sought or granted. THEREFORE, Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, the parties stipulate as follows: 1. The time prescribed for submission of the initial case management statement is extended to April 26, 2010. 2. As required by Local Rule 6-2, this stipulation is supported by the attached Declaration of Christopher E. Skinnell. Dated: March 30, 2010 NIELSEN, MERKSAMER, PARRINELLO, MUELLER & NAYLOR, LLP By:/s/Christopher E. Skinnell Christopher E. Skinnell Attorneys for Plaintiffs . __________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES EXTENDING TIME TO FILE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NO. C 10-00504 RS Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 30, 2010 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By:/s/Andrew Shen Andrew Shen Attorneys for Defendants . ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 45 Pursuant to General Order No. 45 of the Northern District of California, I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories to this document. By: /s/ Christopher E. Skinnell . __________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES EXTENDING TIME TO FILE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NO. C 10-00504 RS Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. March 31, Dated: ____________, 2010 ___________________________ Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Court Judge __________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES EXTENDING TIME TO FILE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NO. C 10-00504 RS Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER E. SKINNELL I, CHRISTOPHER E. SKINNELL, declare as follows: 1. I am one of the attorneys for Plaintiffs in this action, which challenges the constitutionality of San Francisco's instant runoff voting system, used in municipal elections, on the ground that it violates plaintiffs' voting rights. 2. Pursuant to the Order of this Court reassigning this action to Judge Seeborg (Dkt. #40), the initial case management statement is currently scheduled to be filed in this action on April 2, 2010. 3. Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction is currently pending before the Court, and is scheduled for hearing on April 1, 2010--the day before the case management statement is due. 4. The parties have conferred and are in agreement that the initial CMC statement will be better focused, and more informative to the Court, if filed at a later date that will permit consideration of the Court's comments at the hearing. 5. No previous extension of time to file the case management statement has been sought or ordered. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct of my own personal knowledge except for those matters stated on information and belief and, as to those matters, I believe them to be true. If called as a witness, I could competently testify thereto. Executed on March 30, 2010, at San Rafael, California. By: /s/ Christopher E. Skinnell . __________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES EXTENDING TIME TO FILE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NO. C 10-00504 RS Page 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?