Catchings v. Salazar et al

Filing 27

ORDER re 26 Stipulation filed by Rufus Catchings Settlement Conference Rescheduled for 6/14/2011 10:00 AM. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge MARIA-ELENA JAMES on 3/29/11. (bjtS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2011)

Download PDF
Catchings v. Salazar et al Doc. 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Richard A. Hoyer (SBN 151931) David C. Lipps (SBN 269933) HOYER & ASSOCIATES 240 Stockton Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 956-1360 Fax: (415) 276-1738 Attorneys for Plaintiff RUFUS CATCHINGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity as ) ) Secretary of the Interior, ) ) Defendant. ) RUFUS CATCHINGS, Case No. 10-00625-TEH (MEJ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WHEREAS essential discovery in this case will not be completed until the end of April. WHEREAS, because further discovery is necessary in order to adequately assess the value of the case, the mandatory settlement conference currently scheduled for April 5, 2011 will be of limited value to the parties and the Court. THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that the mandatory settlement 24 25 26 27 28 conference be continued until June 14, 2011. /// /// STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 Dated: March 29, 2011 HOYER & ASSOCIATES /s/ ___________________________ David C. Lipps Attorney for Plaintiff RUFUS CATCHINGS Dated: March 29, 2011 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE /s/ ___________________________ Victoria Carradero Attorney for Defendant KEN SALAZAR IT IS ORDERED that the mandatory settlement conference shall be continued until June 14, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. Dated: March 29, 2011 IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________ Chief Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?